Auto-sync: update nexus workspace
This commit is contained in:
29
wiki/concepts/ALB-Ingress-Controller.md
Normal file
29
wiki/concepts/ALB-Ingress-Controller.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "ALB Ingress Controller"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags: [AWS, Kubernetes, EKS, networking, ingress, load-balancing]
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
|
||||
AWS Load Balancer Controller(原名 ALB Ingress Controller)是运行在 Kubernetes 集群中的控制器,通过 Kubernetes Ingress 资源动态管理 AWS Application Load Balancer(ALB)的生命周期。它将 Ingress 规则转换为 ALB 配置(目标组、监听规则、路径路由),实现外部流量到集群内 Pod 的自动路由,是 EKS 集群入口流量管理的标准方案。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ingress 驱动**:用户定义 Kubernetes Ingress 资源声明路由规则,控制器自动创建/更新对应 ALB
|
||||
- **多层路由**:支持基于主机名(host-based)和路径(path-based)的路由规则
|
||||
- **AWS WAF 集成**:ALB 可关联 AWS WAF Web ACL,实现 L7 安全防护
|
||||
- **健康检查自动化**:自动配置目标组健康检查指向 Pod 健康端点
|
||||
- **多种 Ingress 类**:支持公开(internet-facing)和私有(internal)ALB
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with Kubernetes Ingress
|
||||
|
||||
AWS Load Balancer Controller 扩展了 Kubernetes Ingress API 的 AWS 后端实现:
|
||||
- 标准 Kubernetes Ingress 定义路由规则
|
||||
- 控制器解释规则并调用 AWS API 创建/配置 ALB
|
||||
- 替代手动 ALB 管理,实现声明式基础设施
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
38
wiki/concepts/API-Server-Priority-and-Fairness.md
Normal file
38
wiki/concepts/API-Server-Priority-and-Fairness.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "API Server Priority and Fairness"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- API-Server
|
||||
- Performance
|
||||
- Multi-Tenancy
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
API Server Priority and Fairness(PPF)是 Kubernetes 1.20+ 引入的 API Server 配置特性,通过优先级类别(Priority Class)和并发限制(Flow Schema)管理 API 请求的调度和限流,确保关键工作负载在高负载下的 API 访问稳定性。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
- **Priority Class**:为 API 请求分配优先级(整数越大优先级越高)
|
||||
- **Flow Schema**:定义请求匹配规则,将请求路由到对应的 Flow
|
||||
- **Concurrency Limit**:每个 Flow 的并发请求数限制
|
||||
- **Request Limiting**:超出限制的请求进入等待队列或被拒绝
|
||||
|
||||
## Why Enable PPF
|
||||
- 多租户 EKS 集群中,防止单个租户/工作负载耗尽 API Server 资源
|
||||
- 在扩缩容期间(大量 HPA/Controller 并发请求)保护关键 API 调用
|
||||
- 提升 API Server 在高负载下的可预测性和稳定性
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration
|
||||
- 通过 kube-apiserver 启动参数 `--enable-priority-and-fairness=true` 启用
|
||||
- Flow Schema 和 Priority Level 通过 kube-apiserver 配置或 admission webhook 管理
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with Scaling
|
||||
- 在大规模集群扩缩容时,HPA、Cluster Autoscaler、Custom Controller 等大量并发 API 请求可能压垮 API Server
|
||||
- PPF 确保关键扩缩容操作的 API 请求优先处理
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
29
wiki/concepts/AWS-Service-Catalog.md
Normal file
29
wiki/concepts/AWS-Service-Catalog.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "AWS Service Catalog"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags: [AWS, IaC, self-service, governance, EKS]
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
|
||||
AWS Service Catalog 是 AWS 托管的服务,允许组织创建和管理已批准在 AWS 上使用的产品(Products)目录。这些产品本质上是 CloudFormation 模板或 Terraform 模块的受控版本,通过 Portfolio(产品组合)组织,并可授予特定用户或团队访问权限。Service Catalog 为终端用户提供自助服务界面,无需深入了解底层 IaC 模板即可部署标准化的基础设施,同时保证安全与合规。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
- **产品(Products)**:预定义的 CloudFormation 模板或 Terraform 模块,代表标准化的基础设施配置
|
||||
- **产品组合(Portfolio)**:产品的逻辑分组,可关联到团队或项目
|
||||
- **访问控制**:通过 IAM 角色向终端用户授予产品访问权限,实现最小权限原则
|
||||
- **版本管理**:支持同一产品的多版本管理,可逐步升级
|
||||
- **EKS 部署集成**:SRE EKS 模块通过 Service Catalog 提供 EKS 集群部署界面,支持版本选择和节点类型配置
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with IaC
|
||||
|
||||
Service Catalog 封装底层 IaC 模板(Terraform/CloudFormation),为非技术用户提供受控的自助服务入口:
|
||||
- IaC 模板由平台团队维护(在 Git 仓库中通过 CI/CD 管理)
|
||||
- Service Catalog 充当面向终端用户的治理层,控制可部署的产品范围
|
||||
- 相比直接 Terraform 部署,Service Catalog 提供更细粒度的权限控制
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-3-deploy-and-maintain-infrastructure]]
|
||||
31
wiki/concepts/CloudWatch-Agent.md
Normal file
31
wiki/concepts/CloudWatch-Agent.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "CloudWatch Agent"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags: [AWS, monitoring, EKS, logging, metrics, CloudWatch]
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
|
||||
CloudWatch Agent 是 AWS 提供的统一代理程序,用于从 EC2 实例和 EKS 集群收集系统级指标和日志,并将其发布到 Amazon CloudWatch。它支持收集标准系统指标(CPU/内存/磁盘/网络)以及自定义应用指标,是 EKS 监控栈的核心组件之一。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
- **指标收集**:CPU、内存、磁盘、网络等系统级指标,以及自定义应用指标
|
||||
- **日志收集**:从文件系统或容器日志收集日志数据
|
||||
- **配置灵活性**:通过 SSM Parameter Store 或配置文件管理代理配置
|
||||
- **EKS 集成**:在 EKS 中作为 DaemonSet 部署在每个节点上,与 Container Insights 协同工作
|
||||
- **Container Insights**:启用后自动发布容器级指标(CPU/内存/磁盘/网络/容器进程)
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with Other Monitoring Components
|
||||
|
||||
CloudWatch Agent 是 EKS 监控数据采集层:
|
||||
- CloudWatch Agent → 收集原始指标/日志
|
||||
- FluentBit → 处理并转发日志到 CloudWatch Logs 或 OpenSearch
|
||||
- Container Insights → 聚合容器指标到 CloudWatch
|
||||
- Grafana → 从 CloudWatch/OpenSearch 可视化展示
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-42-grafana-observability-dashboard]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-67-cloud-native-observability-using-opentelemetry]]
|
||||
@@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Cluster Autoscaler"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags: [Kubernetes, 自动扩缩容, 云原生]
|
||||
sources: [ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac, ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-24
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Cluster Autoscaler
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
Cluster Autoscaler 是 Kubernetes 的自动扩缩容组件,根据资源需求自动调整 Worker Node 的数量,实现基础设施的弹性伸缩。
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
1. **监控资源使用情况**:定期检查 Pod 的调度状态
|
||||
2. **检测资源不足**:当 Pod 因资源不足无法调度时触发扩容
|
||||
3. **调用云提供商的 API**:AWS 上与 Auto Scaling Groups 集成
|
||||
4. **自动启动新节点**:在可用区中启动新 EC2 实例
|
||||
5. **缩容检测**:当节点利用率低且 Pod 可安全驱逐时,触发缩容
|
||||
|
||||
## AWS Integration
|
||||
- 与 AWS Auto Scaling Groups 深度集成
|
||||
- 支持多个 Auto Scaling Groups
|
||||
- 根据 Pod 需求自动选择合适的实例类型
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Concepts
|
||||
- [[Amazon EKS]]:Cluster Autoscaler 部署的目标平台
|
||||
- [[Kubernetes]]:Cluster Autoscaler 是 Kubernetes 的核心组件
|
||||
- [[Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA)]]:Pod 级别的水平扩缩容(HPA 扩 Pod,CA 扩 Node)
|
||||
- [[Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA)]]:Pod 级别的垂直扩缩容
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Cluster Autoscaler"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- Autoscaling
|
||||
- Node
|
||||
- AWS
|
||||
- ASG
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
- ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
Cluster Autoscaler 是 Kubernetes 官方的节点(Node)级别扩缩容组件,通过联动 AWS Auto Scaling Group(ASG)或托管节点组(Managed Node Group),根据集群内 Pending Pod 的数量和资源请求自动调整节点数量。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
- **扩缩容决策依据**:集群内 Pending Pod 的数量(而非直接基于资源利用率)
|
||||
- **资源请求感知**:考虑 Pod 的 CPU/内存 requests,不仅仅是当前实际使用量
|
||||
- **ASG/节点组联动**:更新 ASG 或托管节点组的期望容量(Desired Capacity)
|
||||
- **Auto-discovery 模式**:推荐使用,自动发现和管理 ASG
|
||||
- **Mixed Instances Policy**:支持在同一 ASG 中混合使用多种 EC2 实例类型
|
||||
- **配置变更**:min/max 配置变更应在 ASG/托管节点组层面操作,而非直接修改 Cluster Autoscaler
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with Karpenter
|
||||
- **Cluster Autoscaler**:基于节点组间接扩缩容,响应相对较慢
|
||||
- **Karpenter**:直接与 EC2 API 交互,响应更快速灵活,是 Cluster Autoscaler 的演进方案
|
||||
|
||||
## Limitations
|
||||
- 依赖预配置的 ASG/节点组,灵活性受限
|
||||
- 扩容速度受 ASG 启动新实例的速度限制
|
||||
- 无法处理需要特殊实例类型的工作负载
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac]]
|
||||
|
||||
29
wiki/concepts/Container-Insights.md
Normal file
29
wiki/concepts/Container-Insights.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Container Insights"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags: [AWS, EKS, monitoring, metrics, CloudWatch, containers]
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
|
||||
Container Insights 是 Amazon CloudWatch 的容器监控功能,专门用于收集、整理和汇总 EKS 和 ECS 集群中容器化工作负载的指标和日志。它通过 CloudWatch Agent(DaemonSet)和 CloudWatch Embedded Metric Format 自动收集容器级指标,使运维团队无需额外配置即可获得集群运行状况的可见性。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
- **自动指标收集**:容器 CPU/内存/网络/磁盘使用率,Pod 级别聚合
|
||||
- **日志收集**:容器标准输出日志自动采集至 CloudWatch Logs
|
||||
- **预构建仪表板**:提供集群、节点、Pod、服务级别的可视化仪表板
|
||||
- **性能告警**:自动发现高负载资源并生成 CloudWatch 告警
|
||||
- **Embedded Metric Format**:应用可直接输出结构化指标,无需额外 SDK
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with CloudWatch Agent
|
||||
|
||||
Container Insights 建立在 CloudWatch Agent 之上:
|
||||
- CloudWatch Agent(DaemonSet)是数据采集代理
|
||||
- Container Insights 是指标组织和聚合逻辑(通过 CloudWatch Agent 配置实现)
|
||||
- 用户启用 Container Insights 后,CloudWatch Agent 自动开始发布容器指标
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-42-grafana-observability-dashboard]]
|
||||
35
wiki/concepts/CoreDNS-Scaling.md
Normal file
35
wiki/concepts/CoreDNS-Scaling.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "CoreDNS Scaling"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- DNS
|
||||
- Scaling
|
||||
- Networking
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
CoreDNS Scaling 是 EKS 集群中 CoreDNS(Kubernetes 默认 DNS 服务)的水平扩缩容策略和优化实践,确保在高密度 Pod 环境下 DNS 查询的高可用性和低延迟。
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Statement
|
||||
- EKS 集群规模增长时,Pod 间的 DNS 查询量呈指数增长
|
||||
- 默认 CoreDNS 配置可能无法应对大规模集群的 DNS 负载
|
||||
- DNS 查询延迟直接影响应用启动时间和运行时性能
|
||||
|
||||
## Optimization Strategies
|
||||
- **HPA 扩缩容**:为 CoreDNS Deployment 配置 HPA,基于 DNS 查询 QPS 或 CPU/内存利用率自动调整副本数
|
||||
- **Node Local DNS Cache**:在每个节点部署本地 DNS 缓存(node-local-dns-cache 或 nodelocaldns),减少跨节点 DNS 查询
|
||||
- **性能调优**:调整 CoreDNS 的 `cores-per-second` 和 `max-concurrent-queries` 参数
|
||||
- **副本数规划**:建议 CoreDNS 副本数不低于集群节点数的 10-20%
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with Node Local DNS Cache
|
||||
- Node Local DNS Cache 通过在每节点运行本地 DNS 缓存 DaemonSet,拦截并缓存 Pod 的 DNS 查询
|
||||
- 减少跨节点 DNS 查询流量,降低 DNS 查询延迟
|
||||
- 与 CoreDNS HPA 扩缩容配合使用效果最佳
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
56
wiki/concepts/EKS-Custom-Networking.md
Normal file
56
wiki/concepts/EKS-Custom-Networking.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "EKS Custom Networking"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- AWS
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- Networking
|
||||
- VPC
|
||||
- IPAM
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
EKS Custom Networking 是 AWS EKS 提供的一项功能,允许用户绕过默认的 VPC CNI(Amazon VPC CNI plugin for Kubernetes)行为,自定义 Pod 的网络 IP 分配策略。这在 IP 地址受限或需要特殊网络配置的环境中尤为重要。
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
EKS 自定义网络(Custom Networking)通过以下机制实现:
|
||||
- 通过 EKS 模块的自定义网络配置标志(flag)启用
|
||||
- 支持指定自定义的弹性网络接口(ENI)配置
|
||||
- 允许 Pod 使用独立于默认 VPC 子网的 IP 地址池
|
||||
|
||||
## Use Case: AWS Lab Landing Zone
|
||||
在 AWS Lab Landing Zone 环境中,Micro Focus 网络的 IP 地址池有限,无法满足 EKS 集群中大量 Pod 的 IP 分配需求。通过自定义网络配置:
|
||||
1. 在独立私有子网(非主 VPC 子网)创建 EKS 集群
|
||||
2. 启用 EKS 模块的自定义网络标志
|
||||
3. EKS 使用指定的子网和 IP 范围分配 Pod 地址
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Mechanism
|
||||
```
|
||||
EKS Module (Terraform)
|
||||
└── custom_networking_enabled = true
|
||||
├── subnet_ids = [custom_subnet_ids]
|
||||
└── additional_eni_config = ...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Benefits
|
||||
- **突破 VPC CIDR 限制**:在受限网络环境中仍可部署大规模 Pod
|
||||
- **IP 地址灵活性**:使用专用 IP 池,无需消耗 VPC 主网络地址
|
||||
- **网络隔离**:独立子网提供额外的网络安全边界
|
||||
|
||||
## Limitations
|
||||
- 需要 Terraform/Terragrunt 模块支持自定义网络标志
|
||||
- Atlantis 当前不支持 EKS 集群部署(需使用 Jenkins + Terragrunt)
|
||||
- 容器安全加固需额外考虑网络隔离
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Concepts
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]]:应用自定义网络技术的容器编排平台
|
||||
- [[Host-Network-Mode]]:Pod 规范层面的网络模式配置
|
||||
- [[EMI-Elastic-Network-Interface]]:ENI 多 IP 分配(EMI)在 EKS 中的应用
|
||||
- [[IPAM]]:IP 地址管理,与自定义网络协同
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone]]
|
||||
29
wiki/concepts/EMI-Elastic-Network-Interface.md
Normal file
29
wiki/concepts/EMI-Elastic-Network-Interface.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "EMI (Elastic Network Interface) Multi-IP"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags: [AWS, EKS, networking, VPC, CIDR, pod-networking]
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
|
||||
EMI(Elastic Network Interface Multi-IP,弹性网络接口多 IP)是 AWS 提供的网络扩展机制,通过为 Pod 分配额外的弹性网络接口(ENI)及其上的辅助 IP 地址,解决 EKS 集群中 VPC CIDR 地址空间不足的问题。每个 ENI 允许附加多个辅助 IP,每个 IP 可分配给一个 Pod,相比默认的 AWS VPC CNI 插件可大幅增加单个节点可运行的 Pod 数量。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
- **ENI 附加**:为工作节点附加额外 ENI 以增加可用 IP 数量
|
||||
- **IP 分配**:每个 ENI 上的辅助 IP 分配给 Pod,实现 Pod 级 IP 直接寻址
|
||||
- **CIDR 扩展**:不依赖 VPC 主 CIDR 范围,通过 ENI 附加 IP 绕过 VPC 地址空间限制
|
||||
- **安全组绑定**:ENI 及其上的 Pod IP 继承安全组配置
|
||||
- **与 AWS VPC CNI 插件的关系**:AWS VPC CNI 是默认插件,EMI 是其增强模式,支持 Prefix Delegation
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Solved
|
||||
|
||||
VPC CIDR 限制导致大型 EKS 集群 Pod 数量受限于可用 IP 地址:
|
||||
- 标准 AWS VPC CNI 每个 ENI 最多约 10-15 个 IP(受实例类型限制)
|
||||
- EMI 通过 ENI 附加更多辅助 IP,显著提升 Pod 密度
|
||||
- 特别适用于 IP 密集型工作负载(如微服务架构)
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone]]
|
||||
35
wiki/concepts/FedRAMP.md
Normal file
35
wiki/concepts/FedRAMP.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "FedRAMP"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Compliance
|
||||
- Cloud-Security
|
||||
- Government
|
||||
- Certification
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program)
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
美国政府级的云安全认证项目,为云服务和云产品提供统一的安全评估和授权标准。FedRAMP 基于 [[ISO-27001]] 和 NIST SP 800-53 控制框架。
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
- 为联邦机构提供标准化的云服务安全评估方法
|
||||
- 减少重复安全评估,降低成本
|
||||
- 确保云服务提供商达到政府级别的安全标准
|
||||
|
||||
## Business Value for OpenText
|
||||
- **市场准入**:FedRAMP 认证使 OpenText 能够向联邦政府机构销售云服务
|
||||
- **多垂直市场覆盖**:持有 FedRAMP 等多项行业及政府认证,可进入多个垂直市场
|
||||
- **差异化优势**:证明安全成熟度,增强客户信心
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to Other Concepts
|
||||
- 基于 [[ISO-27001]] 构建
|
||||
- 与 [[Global Information Security Policy (GISP)]] 配合,满足政策层面的合规要求
|
||||
- 与 [[Third-Party-Penetration-Testing]] 配合,通过第三方验证满足认证要求
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[ISO-27001]]:框架基础
|
||||
- [[Global Information Security Policy (GISP)]]:政策支撑
|
||||
- [[OpenText]]:持有该认证的组织
|
||||
31
wiki/concepts/FluentBit.md
Normal file
31
wiki/concepts/FluentBit.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Fluent Bit"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags: [AWS, EKS, logging, monitoring, CNCF, Fluentd]
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
|
||||
Fluent Bit(CNFC 开源项目)是轻量级日志处理器和转发器,设计用于边缘和容器环境,作为 DaemonSet 部署在每个 Kubernetes 节点上。它从容器运行时(containerd/Docker)收集标准输出(stdout/stderr)日志,处理后转发到 CloudWatch Logs、OpenSearch、Elasticsearch 等后端存储系统,是 EKS 可观测性架构中日志采集的标准组件。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
- **日志采集**:通过容器运行时接口收集容器标准输出日志
|
||||
- **多后端输出**:支持 CloudWatch Logs、OpenSearch、Elasticsearch、Kafka 等多种输出目标
|
||||
- **日志处理**:支持过滤(filter)、解析(parser)、路由(router)等处理管道
|
||||
- **轻量高效**:相比 Fluentd 更小的资源占用,适合边缘/容器环境
|
||||
- **Kubernetes DaemonSet 模式**:每个节点运行一个实例,自动采集所有容器日志
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with Fluentd and CloudWatch Agent
|
||||
|
||||
Fluent Bit 是 Fluentd 的轻量替代(同一项目家族):
|
||||
- Fluentd:功能更全面,适合复杂日志处理场景,资源占用更高
|
||||
- Fluent Bit:轻量快速,专为边缘和容器优化
|
||||
- CloudWatch Agent:侧重指标收集,Fluent Bit 侧重日志收集
|
||||
- 在 EKS 监控栈中:Fluent Bit → CloudWatch Logs/OpenSearch → Grafana/OpenSearch Dashboards
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac]]
|
||||
- [[public-cloud-learning-sessions-observability-with-opentelemetry-20240402-160113]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-67-cloud-native-observability-using-opentelemetry]]
|
||||
32
wiki/concepts/Global-Information-Security-Policy-GISP.md
Normal file
32
wiki/concepts/Global-Information-Security-Policy-GISP.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Global Information Security Policy (GISP)"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- OpenText
|
||||
- Security-Policy
|
||||
- Governance
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Global Information Security Policy (GISP)
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
OpenText 的最高纲领性安全政策,是所有其他安全政策的根基。GISP 由全球信息安全团队(GIS)制定和支持,定期(每季度)接受领导层审查。
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
- 定义企业"需要做什么"(what),同时为"如何实施"(how)提供灵活性
|
||||
- 支持性政策(Supporting Policies)围绕 GISP 构建
|
||||
- 鼓励反馈以实现持续改进
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to Other Concepts
|
||||
- 基于 [[ISO-27001]] 姿态框架
|
||||
- 与 [[Security-Awareness-Training]] 配合提升全员安全意识
|
||||
- 与 [[Third-Party-Penetration-Testing]] 配合验证政策有效性
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Quote
|
||||
> "Policies define what needs to be done, while providing flexibility for how it is implemented." — GIS Policy Framework
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[Global Information Security Team (GIS)]]:制定与维护团队
|
||||
- [[ISO-27001]]:框架基础
|
||||
- [[OpenText]]:所属组织
|
||||
36
wiki/concepts/Horizontal-Pod-Autoscaler.md
Normal file
36
wiki/concepts/Horizontal-Pod-Autoscaler.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA)"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- Autoscaling
|
||||
- Pod
|
||||
- Metrics
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
- ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) 是 Kubernetes 标准的工作负载水平扩缩容机制,通过监测 Pod 的资源使用指标(CPU、内存或自定义指标)自动调整 Pod 副本数,以满足应用负载需求。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
- **指标采集**:通过 Metrics Server 获取 CPU/内存利用率指标
|
||||
- **副本计算**:基于目标阈值计算所需 Pod 副本数
|
||||
- **稳定性配置**:通过 `stabilizationWindowSeconds` 和 `periodSeconds` 防止震荡(flapping)
|
||||
- **自定义/外部指标**:支持通过 Custom Metrics API 和 External Metrics API 集成负载均衡器并发连接数、消息中间件队列深度等业务指标
|
||||
- **Pod 级而非容器级**:当前 HPA 仅考虑 Pod 整体资源消耗,不支持容器级别的独立扩缩
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with VPA
|
||||
- **HPA**:水平扩展(增加/减少 Pod 副本数)
|
||||
- **VPA (Vertical Pod Autoscaler)**:垂直扩展(调整单个 Pod 的资源请求)
|
||||
- 两者可互补使用:HPA 应对流量波动,VPA 优化资源分配
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with KEDA
|
||||
- KEDA 可通过 **Publishes Metrics 模式** 为 HPA 供数,实现指标驱动与事件驱动的混合扩缩容
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
50
wiki/concepts/Host-Network-Mode.md
Normal file
50
wiki/concepts/Host-Network-Mode.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Host Network Mode"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- Networking
|
||||
- Pod-Networking
|
||||
- AWS
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
Host Network Mode 是 Kubernetes Pod 规范中的一种网络配置选项(`hostNetwork: true`),使 Pod 共享宿主机的网络命名空间,直接使用宿主机的网络接口和 IP 地址,而不是通过 Kubernetes 的虚拟网络。
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
在 Pod spec 中设置 `hostNetwork: true` 后,Pod 将:
|
||||
- 使用宿主机的网络命名空间
|
||||
- 直接获得宿主机网络接口上的 IP 地址
|
||||
- 可以绑定宿主机的端口(如 80、443)
|
||||
- 可直接访问宿主机所在网络上的资源
|
||||
|
||||
## Use Case: EKS Lab Landing Zone
|
||||
在 AWS Lab Landing Zone 的 EKS 部署中,Octane 等 IP 密集型应用需要大量可用 IP。通过自定义网络模式,Pod 无需通过 VPC CNI 分配 IP,而是直接使用宿主机网络的 IP 地址,从而绕开 AWS Lab 环境 IP 地址池受限的问题。
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
hostNetwork: true
|
||||
containers:
|
||||
- name: octane
|
||||
image: octane:latest
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Trade-offs
|
||||
| 优点 | 缺点 |
|
||||
|------|------|
|
||||
| 突破 Pod IP 数量限制 | Pod 之间端口冲突风险 |
|
||||
| 直接访问宿主机网络资源 | 安全性降低(Pod 可访问宿主机所有网络) |
|
||||
| 简化网络路径 | 违反 Kubernetes 网络隔离原则 |
|
||||
| 适合特殊网络需求场景 | 难以在不同环境中移植 |
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Concepts
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]]:使用 Host Network Mode 的容器编排平台
|
||||
- [[IPAM]]:IP 地址管理,与 Host Network Mode 在 IP 分配上形成互补
|
||||
- [[Kubernetes-Tagging]]:Pod 标记策略
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone]]
|
||||
39
wiki/concepts/IPv6-in-EKS.md
Normal file
39
wiki/concepts/IPv6-in-EKS.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "IPv6 in EKS"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- AWS
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- IPv6
|
||||
- Networking
|
||||
- IP-Address-Exhaustion
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
IPv6-in-EKS 是 Amazon EKS 集群解决 IP 地址耗尽(IP Exhaustion)问题的网络架构方案,通过部署 IPv6 或双栈(Dual-Stack)VPC,实现大规模容器工作负载的 IP 地址可持续供给。
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Statement
|
||||
- 每个 EKS 节点上的 ENI(Elastic Network Interface)附带可分配的 IP 地址数量有限
|
||||
- VPC CIDR 块大小固定,Pod 数量增长导致可用 IP 耗尽
|
||||
- 自定义网络(Custom Networking)和 Prefix Delegation 可缓解但不能根本解决
|
||||
|
||||
## Solution: IPv6 Dual-Stack VPC
|
||||
- **双栈架构**:VPC 同时支持 IPv4 和 IPv6 地址
|
||||
- **节点双协议栈**:EKS 节点同时持有 IPv4 和 IPv6 地址
|
||||
- **Pod 仅 IPv6**:Pod 仅分配 IPv6 地址(节省 IPv4 空间)
|
||||
- **NAT 映射**:IPv6 Pod 与 IPv4 目标通信时,通过双层 NAT 映射转换
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternative: Carrier-Grade NAT (CGNAT)
|
||||
- 如无法迁移至 IPv6,可使用 CGNAT 方案
|
||||
- 通过自定义网络 + NAT 网关聚合多个 Pod 的出站流量
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits
|
||||
- IP 地址空间近乎无限(解决耗尽问题)
|
||||
- 简化网络配置(无需管理大量 IPv4 地址)
|
||||
- 符合云原生网络发展趋势
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
40
wiki/concepts/ISO-27001.md
Normal file
40
wiki/concepts/ISO-27001.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "ISO-27001"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Security-Framework
|
||||
- Compliance
|
||||
- Information-Security
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# ISO-27001
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
国际认可的信息安全管理体系(ISMS)标准,由国际标准化组织(ISO)和国际电工委员会(IEC)发布。ISO 27001 是企业信息安全管理的基准框架。
|
||||
|
||||
## OpenText Implementation
|
||||
- 作为 OpenText 安全姿态框架(Posture Framework)的基础
|
||||
- 2022 年更新,新增 11 个控制方面(control aspects)
|
||||
- 支撑 [[Global Information Security Policy (GISP)]] 的框架基础
|
||||
- 支撑 [[FedRAMP]] 等行业认证
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Controls
|
||||
- 信息安全组织(Information Security Organization)
|
||||
- 人力资源安全(Human Resource Security)
|
||||
- 资产管理(Asset Management)
|
||||
- 访问控制(Access Control)
|
||||
- 加密(Cryptography)
|
||||
- 物理与环境安全(Physical and Environmental Security)
|
||||
- 操作安全(Operations Security)
|
||||
- 通信安全(Communications Security)
|
||||
- 系统获取、开发和维护(System Acquisition, Development and Maintenance)
|
||||
- 供应商关系(Supplier Relationships)
|
||||
- 信息安全事件管理(Information Security Incident Management)
|
||||
- 业务连续性管理(Business Continuity Management)
|
||||
- 合规性(Compliance)
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[Global Information Security Policy (GISP)]]:基于 ISO 27001 构建
|
||||
- [[FedRAMP]]:基于 ISO 27001 之上
|
||||
- [[OpenText]]:采用该标准的企业
|
||||
36
wiki/concepts/KEDA.md
Normal file
36
wiki/concepts/KEDA.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "KEDA (Kubernetes Event-Driven Autoscaling)"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- Autoscaling
|
||||
- Event-Driven
|
||||
- Serverless
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
KEDA(Kubernetes Event-Driven Autoscaling)是一个基于外部事件驱动的 Kubernetes 扩缩容框架,通过 ScaledObject 自定义资源定义(CRD)实现细粒度的事件驱动扩缩容,支持将应用从零副本扩展到任意规模。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
- **ScaledObject CRD**:定义扩缩规则,指定 Scaler 和目标副本数范围
|
||||
- **事件源(Scalers)**:支持 50+ 种事件源(Kafka、RabbitMQ、AWS SQS、Azure Queue、HTTP 等)
|
||||
- **零扩展(Scale to Zero)**:支持将应用缩容至零副本,降低空闲资源成本
|
||||
- **Publishes Metrics 模式**:可向 HPA 发布指标,实现事件驱动与指标驱动的混合扩缩容
|
||||
- **声明式配置**:通过 YAML 配置文件定义扩缩行为,与 GitOps 工作流兼容
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with HPA
|
||||
- KEDA 可独立工作,也可作为 HPA 的指标提供者
|
||||
- 组合模式:KEDA 监听外部事件 → 发布指标 → HPA 基于指标调整副本数
|
||||
|
||||
## Use Cases
|
||||
- 事件驱动微服务(消息队列消费者)
|
||||
- 批处理作业(按需触发)
|
||||
- 突发流量场景(限时促销、实时事件)
|
||||
- 无服务器化改造(零扩展降低成本)
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
30
wiki/concepts/Karpenter.md
Normal file
30
wiki/concepts/Karpenter.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Karpenter"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags: [AWS, Kubernetes, EKS, autoscaling, node-provisioning]
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
|
||||
Karpenter 是 AWS 开源的 Kubernetes 节点自动配置工具(Node Auto-Provisioner),通过动态创建最优实例类型来响应未调度 Pod 的资源需求,替代传统的 Cluster Autoscaler。相比 Cluster Autoscaler 基于节点组(Node Group)的扩缩容模式,Karpenter 直接与 EC2 API 交互,根据 Pod 规格(CPU/内存/GPU 需求)即时选择最合适的 EC2 实例类型,实现更快的扩容速度和更低的资源浪费。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
- **即时节点供给**:监听未调度 Pod 事件,秒级启动新节点,无需等待节点组预配置
|
||||
- **最佳实例选择**:根据 Pod 资源请求从 EC2 实例类型池中选择最优匹配
|
||||
- **多样化实例类型**:支持多种 EC2 类型(CPU/GPU/Spot/On-Demand),灵活利用 Spot 实例节省成本
|
||||
- **标签驱动配置**:通过 `NodeTemplate` 定义标签/要求,自动匹配特定 Pod 到特定节点
|
||||
- **与 Cluster Autoscaler 的区别**:Cluster Autoscaler 依赖节点组规模调整,Karpenter 直接控制 EC2 实例创建,响应更快速灵活
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with Cluster Autoscaler
|
||||
|
||||
Karpenter 是 Cluster Autoscaler 的替代/演进方案:
|
||||
- Cluster Autoscaler 通过调整节点组规模间接扩缩节点
|
||||
- Karpenter 直接与 EC2 API 交互创建/终止节点,更快速灵活
|
||||
- EKS Auto Mode(Part 3 of 3)已集成 Karpenter 作为 Carpenter Controller 组件
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac]]
|
||||
- [[public-cloud-learning-sessions-eks-optimization-part-1-of-3-compute-optimization]]
|
||||
- [[public-cloud-learning-sessions-eks-optimization-part-3-of-3-introduction-to-eks]]
|
||||
40
wiki/concepts/Metrics-Server.md
Normal file
40
wiki/concepts/Metrics-Server.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Metrics Server"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- Metrics
|
||||
- Monitoring
|
||||
- Autoscaling
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
Metrics Server 是 Kubernetes 集群级别的指标采集组件(Metrics API Provider),负责从 kubelet 收集 CPU/内存等资源使用指标,为 HPA、VPA 和 `kubectl top` 命令提供标准化的指标数据。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Mechanisms
|
||||
- **Metrics API**:实现 `metrics.k8s.io` API,提供 Pod 和 Node 的资源指标
|
||||
- **数据采集**:定期从各节点的 kubelet 获取指标数据
|
||||
- **内存高效**:采用流式处理,仅保留最近 5 分钟的指标数据
|
||||
- **HPA 依赖**:HPA 的标准资源指标(CPU/内存)完全依赖 Metrics Server
|
||||
|
||||
## Deployment
|
||||
- 通过 Deployment 部署单个副本(非高可用)
|
||||
- 通常随 EKS 集群自动安装(EKS Add-on 或 eks-charts)
|
||||
- 监控指标:Pod CPU/内存利用率、Node CPU/内存容量
|
||||
|
||||
## Limitations
|
||||
- 仅支持标准资源指标(CPU、内存)
|
||||
- 不支持自定义/外部指标(需要 Custom Metrics API)
|
||||
- 单副本部署,非高可用设计
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with HPA
|
||||
- HPA 通过 Metrics Server 获取 Pod 的 CPU/内存利用率
|
||||
- 计算公式:`desiredReplicas = ceil(sum(podMetricValue) / targetValue)`
|
||||
- 目标阈值(targetValue)通常设置为 70-80%,保留缓冲空间
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
36
wiki/concepts/Security Awareness Training.md
Normal file
36
wiki/concepts/Security Awareness Training.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Security Awareness Training"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Security
|
||||
- Human-Factor
|
||||
- Training
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Security Awareness Training
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
通过系统化的培训和演练提升组织内所有成员(从员工到高管)对安全威胁的认知和应对能力。
|
||||
|
||||
## Components
|
||||
- **月度安全通讯**:定期向全员推送安全信息和最佳实践
|
||||
- **网络钓鱼演练**:模拟钓鱼攻击测试员工识别能力
|
||||
- **关键指标**:衡量有多少人报告可疑活动(而非仅关注点击率)
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals
|
||||
- 将安全意识融入组织文化
|
||||
- 建立"全员参与"的安全防线
|
||||
- 持续改进安全态势
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Quote
|
||||
> "The focus is on how many people report suspicious activity." — GIS Security Awareness Program
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to [[Global Information Security Policy (GISP)]]
|
||||
- GISP 是政策框架,Security Awareness Training 是执行层的安全意识落地
|
||||
- 两者共同构成"政策+人"的安全治理闭环
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[Global Information Security Policy (GISP)]]:政策基础
|
||||
- [[Global Information Security Team (GIS)]]:执行团队
|
||||
- [[OpenText]]:实施组织
|
||||
37
wiki/concepts/Third Party Penetration Testing.md
Normal file
37
wiki/concepts/Third Party Penetration Testing.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Third-Party Penetration Testing"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Security
|
||||
- Testing
|
||||
- Penetration-Testing
|
||||
- Red-Team
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Third-Party Penetration Testing
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
由独立第三方安全机构执行的渗透测试和红队演练,用于客观评估组织的安全态势,发现内部视角可能忽略的漏洞。
|
||||
|
||||
## Components
|
||||
- **年度第三方测试**:由独立机构执行年度安全评估
|
||||
- **桌面演练(Tabletop Exercises)**:模拟安全事件和违规场景,测试响应流程
|
||||
- **红队演练(Red Team Exercises)**:在事先不知情的情况下评估组织安全
|
||||
- **高级威胁评估(Advanced Threat Assessments)**
|
||||
- **内部/第三方渗透测试**:定期进行,发现技术漏洞
|
||||
- **客户审计(Customer Audits)**:有时会引发补救活动
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Metrics
|
||||
- 桌面演练:测试事件和违规准备就绪程度
|
||||
- 红队演练:在无预警情况下测试组织安全
|
||||
- OpenText 持续在第三方测试中处于"顶级梯队"
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Quote
|
||||
> "OpenText conducts annual third-party tests, including tabletop exercises for incident and breach readiness, consistently scoring in the top tier." — GIS Team
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[ISO-27001]]:框架要求
|
||||
- [[Global Information Security Policy (GISP)]]:政策支撑
|
||||
- [[Threat-Intelligence]]:结合使用
|
||||
- [[OpenText]]:实施组织
|
||||
37
wiki/concepts/Threat-Intelligence.md
Normal file
37
wiki/concepts/Threat-Intelligence.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Threat Intelligence"
|
||||
type: concept
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Security
|
||||
- Intelligence
|
||||
- SIEM
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Threat Intelligence
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition
|
||||
通过收集、分析和传播关于现有和新兴威胁的信息,使组织能够主动防御安全威胁。
|
||||
|
||||
## Components
|
||||
- **威胁情报 feeds**:从多个来源收集威胁数据
|
||||
- **工具组件(Tool Components)**:主动监控环境
|
||||
- **检测与威胁狩猎(Detection & Threat Hunting)**:主动发现潜在威胁
|
||||
- **SIEM(安全信息与事件管理)**:大规模日志处理
|
||||
|
||||
## OpenText Scale
|
||||
- 大规模 SIM(安全信息管理)实现
|
||||
- 月处理 **2250 亿条日志**(225 billion log rugs)
|
||||
- 月分诊约 **350 个案例**
|
||||
- 利用 [[BrightCloud]] 作为威胁情报 feed 来源
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to Other Concepts
|
||||
- 与 [[Third-Party-Penetration-Testing]] 配合,形成"情报+测试"的主动防御体系
|
||||
- 支撑 [[Global Information Security Policy (GISP)]] 的监控和响应要求
|
||||
- 与 [[ISO-27001]] 的运营安全(Operations Security)控制相一致
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[BrightCloud]]:威胁情报工具
|
||||
- [[Global Information Security Team (GIS)]]:运营团队
|
||||
- [[ISO-27001]]:框架基础
|
||||
- [[OpenText]]:实施组织
|
||||
53
wiki/entities/Amazon-EKS.md
Normal file
53
wiki/entities/Amazon-EKS.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Amazon EKS"
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- AWS
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- Container-Orchestration
|
||||
- SaaS
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone
|
||||
- ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac
|
||||
- ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
- ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) 是 AWS 提供的托管 Kubernetes 服务,负责 Kubernetes 控制平面的可用性和伸缩性,用户只需管理工作节点(数据平面)。
|
||||
|
||||
## Aliases
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service
|
||||
- Amazon EKS
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Characteristics
|
||||
- 完全托管的控制平面(Control Plane)
|
||||
- 与 AWS 服务深度集成(IAM、VPC、ELB、EBS、S3 等)
|
||||
- 支持 Fargate(无服务器计算引擎)和自管理/托管节点组
|
||||
- IAM RBAC 最小权限模型
|
||||
- 零停机滚动更新
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Components
|
||||
- **控制平面**:跨 3 AZ 部署,由 AWS 自动管理 etcd 和 API Server
|
||||
- **数据平面**:Worker Nodes(EC2、自管理或托管节点组)
|
||||
- **Pod 网络**:VPC CNI(默认)或自定义网络模式
|
||||
- **Ingress**:AWS ALB Ingress Controller
|
||||
- **存储**:EBS CSI Driver
|
||||
|
||||
## EKS Custom Networking
|
||||
EKS 支持自定义网络配置,允许绕过 VPC CNI 的默认行为,控制 Pod IP 分配。在受限 IP 地址池的环境中(如 AWS Lab Landing Zone),通过自定义网络标志启用独立子网的 IP 分配。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone]]:在受限 Lab Landing Zone 中的 EKS 实施,解决 IP 地址池不足问题
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac]]:通过 Terraform IaC 部署 EKS 的完整方法论
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks]]:EKS 可靠性最佳实践
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]]:EKS 自动扩缩容策略
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Entities
|
||||
- [[AWS-Landing-Zone]]:EKS 部署的底层基础设施框架
|
||||
- [[AWS]]:EKS 所属的云平台提供商
|
||||
- [[Jenkins]]:EKS 部署的 CI/CD 平台(替代 Atlantis)
|
||||
- [[TerraGrant]]:Terragrunt 模块封装
|
||||
26
wiki/entities/BrightCloud.md
Normal file
26
wiki/entities/BrightCloud.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "BrightCloud"
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- OpenText
|
||||
- Threat-Intelligence
|
||||
- Security-Tools
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# BrightCloud
|
||||
|
||||
**Type:** Product / Security Tool | **Company:** OpenText
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
BrightCloud 是 OpenText 自有的威胁情报工具,作为威胁情报 feeds 的来源,整合到 OpenText 的安全运营体系中。
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage in OpenText
|
||||
- 作为威胁情报 feed 输入到 OpenText 的安全运营平台
|
||||
- 支撑月处理 2250 亿条日志的安全运营体系
|
||||
- 与检测和威胁狩猎(Threat Hunting)结合使用
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[OpenText]]:开发公司
|
||||
- [[Threat-Intelligence]]:所属领域
|
||||
- [[Global Information Security Team (GIS)]]:使用团队
|
||||
28
wiki/entities/Ed.md
Normal file
28
wiki/entities/Ed.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Ed"
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- OpenText
|
||||
- GIS
|
||||
- Security
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Ed
|
||||
|
||||
**Role:** Global Information Security Team (GIS), OpenText
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
Ed 是 OpenText 全球信息安全团队(GIS)的核心成员,与 Mike 共同主持了关于 GIS 安全策略的公开云学习会议。
|
||||
|
||||
## Contributions
|
||||
- 主持 GIS Security Policies 学习会议(2024年10月15日)
|
||||
- 阐述 GIS 组织架构与政策框架
|
||||
|
||||
## Aliases
|
||||
- Ed(GIS)
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[Mike]]:同事,共同主持 GIS 学习会议
|
||||
- [[Global Information Security Team (GIS)]]:所属团队
|
||||
- [[OpenText]]:雇主
|
||||
28
wiki/entities/Mike.md
Normal file
28
wiki/entities/Mike.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Mike"
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- OpenText
|
||||
- GIS
|
||||
- Security
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Mike
|
||||
|
||||
**Role:** Global Information Security Team (GIS), OpenText
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
Mike 是 OpenText 全球信息安全团队(GIS)的核心成员,与 Ed 共同主持了关于 GIS 安全策略的公开云学习会议。
|
||||
|
||||
## Contributions
|
||||
- 主持 GIS Security Policies 学习会议(2024年10月15日)
|
||||
- 阐述 GIS 组织架构与政策框架
|
||||
|
||||
## Aliases
|
||||
- Mike(GIS)
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[Ed]]:同事,共同主持 GIS 学习会议
|
||||
- [[Global Information Security Team (GIS)]]:所属团队
|
||||
- [[OpenText]]:雇主
|
||||
43
wiki/entities/Octane.md
Normal file
43
wiki/entities/Octane.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Octane"
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- MicroFocus
|
||||
- SaaS
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone
|
||||
- ctp-topic-14-octane-hub-on-aws-real-life-experience-moving-production-services-i
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
Octane 是 Micro Focus(现 OpenText)旗下一款 SaaS 应用,以 IP 地址密集型(IP-hungry)workload 著称,是推动 EKS 在 AWS Lab Landing Zone 中实施的核心业务驱动因素。
|
||||
|
||||
## Aliases
|
||||
- Octane
|
||||
- Micro Focus Octane
|
||||
- Octane SaaS
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Characteristics
|
||||
- SaaS 模式部署
|
||||
- IP 地址密集型应用,对 IP 分配有大量需求
|
||||
- 在 AWS 环境中需要 Kubernetes 容器编排能力
|
||||
- 驱动了 OpenText/Micro Focus 团队对 EKS 自定义网络方案的探索
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
Octane 是 CTP Topic 39 中 EKS 部署的驱动用例。标准 EKS 部署方案无法满足其 IP 需求,团队通过以下方案解决:
|
||||
- 创建独立私有子网(非主 VPC 子网)
|
||||
- 启用 EKS 模块的自定义网络配置标志
|
||||
- 在 Pod 规范中设置 `hostNetwork: true`
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Entities
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]]:Octane 部署的容器编排平台
|
||||
- [[AWS-Landing-Zone]]:Octane 运行的 AWS 基础设施环境
|
||||
- [[MicroFocus]]:(历史)开发 Octane 的公司
|
||||
- [[OpenText]]:(现母公司)
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-14-octane-hub-on-aws-real-life-experience-moving-production-services-i]]
|
||||
@@ -1,24 +1,36 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Suravpul"
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
tags: [AWS, Solutions-Architect, EKS]
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-25
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Suravpul
|
||||
|
||||
AWS 高级解决方案架构师(Senior Solutions Architect),专注 Amazon EKS 的可靠性、可观测性和扩缩容实践。
|
||||
|
||||
## Role
|
||||
- AWS Senior Solutions Architect
|
||||
- 主讲 CTP 云转型系列中多个 EKS 深度专题
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks]] — EKS 可靠性最佳实践
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]] — EKS 工作负载扩缩容
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-67-cloud-native-observability-using-opentelemetry]] — EKS 云原生可观测性
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[Amazon EKS]] — 专注领域
|
||||
- [[AWS]] — 雇主
|
||||
- [[Surav Paul]] — 同一人:ctp-topic-59 标注为 "Surav Paul",本视频标注为 "Suravpul",推断为同一 AWS 高级解决方案架构师的不同记法
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Suravpul"
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- AWS
|
||||
- Solutions-Architect
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
- ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks
|
||||
- ctp-topic-67-cloud-native-observability-using-opentelemetry
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
Suravpul 是 Amazon Web Services(AWS)的高级解决方案架构师(Senior Solutions Architect),专注于 Amazon EKS(Elastic Kubernetes Service)的可靠性、可观测性和扩缩容实践。
|
||||
|
||||
## Aliases
|
||||
- Suravpul
|
||||
- Suravpul (AWS)
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Contributions
|
||||
- CTP Topic 59:EKS 可靠性深度实践(HPA、VPA、Pod Disruption Budget)
|
||||
- CTP Topic 64:EKS 工作负载扩缩容完整方法论(HPA、KEDA、Cluster Autoscaler、Karpenter、IPv6)
|
||||
- CTP Topic 67:云原生可观测性最佳实践(OpenTelemetry 集成)
|
||||
|
||||
## Role
|
||||
- **Organization**: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
|
||||
- **Title**: Senior Solutions Architect
|
||||
- **Focus Areas**: EKS reliability, observability, autoscaling, container networking
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-67-cloud-native-observability-using-opentelemetry]]
|
||||
|
||||
129
wiki/index.md
129
wiki/index.md
@@ -4,6 +4,34 @@
|
||||
- [Overview](overview.md) — living synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - OpenText GIS Security Policies - 20241015](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-gis-security-policies-20241015-160257-me.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 64 Scaling out with Amazon EKS](sources/ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 67 Cloud native observability using OpenTelemetry](sources/ctp-topic-67-cloud-native-observability-using-opentelemetry.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - EKS Optimization Part 2 of 3 - Running Containers with Bottlerocket OS](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-eks-optimization-part-2-of-3-running-containers-w.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 42 Grafana Observability Dashboard](sources/ctp-topic-42-grafana-observability-dashboard.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - Observability with OpenTelemetry - 20240402](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-observability-with-opentelemetry-20240402-160113.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 54 ESM SaaS Log Analytics](sources/ctp-topic-54-esm-saas-log-analytics.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 59 Achieving reliability with Amazon EKS](sources/ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 29 Cloud Monitoring – SaaS LZ accounts](sources/ctp-topic-29-cloud-monitoring-saas-lz-accounts.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 39 Implementing EKS in the AWS Lab Landing Zone](sources/ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - EKS Optimization Part 1 of 3 - Compute Optimization with Karpenter](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-eks-optimization-part-1-of-3-compute-optimization.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 70 EKS deployment using IAC](sources/ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 60 - Monitor AWS using Hyperscale Observability with Grafana](sources/ctp-topic-60-monitor-aws-using-hyperscale-observability-with-grafana.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - EKS Optimization Part 3 of 3 - Introduction to EKS Auto Mode](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-eks-optimization-part-3-of-3-introduction-to-eks.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 8 - Implementation of Cloud Monitoring using Micro Focus Operations Bridge Manager](sources/ctp-topic-8-implementation-of-cloud-monitoring-using-micro-focus-operations-brid.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 11 AD Integration and Login using AD Accounts](sources/ctp-topic-11-ad-integration-and-login-using-ad-accounts.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 5 - AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)](sources/ctp-topic-5-aws-identity-and-access-management-iam.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Learning Sessions Identity Governance VSM Replacement - 20231128](sources/learning-sessions-identity-governance-vsm-replacement-20231128-160326-meeting-re.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - AWS End User Compute Services - 20240430](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-aws-end-user-compute-services-20240430-160120-mee.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions- Applicable Business Analysis Techniques - 20240109](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-applicable-business-analysis-techniques-20240109.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions (OpenText) - Product Hub (PHT) Overview and Q&A - 20240806](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-product-hub-pht-overview-and-qa-20240806.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - Tagging Standards for All Hyperscalers - 20240123](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-tagging-standards-for-all-hyperscalers-20240123-1.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 23 Introduction to the Technical Architecture Team and Function](sources/ctp-topic-23-introduction-to-the-technical-architecture-team-and-function.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 57 Product backlog managing demand](sources/ctp-topic-57-product-backlog-managing-demand.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions (OpenText) - Thor Platform & Flows](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-thor-platform-flows-20241210-160056-meet.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 6 AWS Workspaces Demo](sources/ctp-topic-6-aws-workspaces-demo.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 53 Why bother with Cloud](sources/ctp-topic-53-why-bother-with-cloud.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions (OpenText) - GitHub Enterprise to GitLab Migration](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-github-enterprise-to-gitlab-migration-20.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - OpenText Tagging Standard v2 - 20250429](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-tagging-standard-v2-20250429-170111-meet.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 41 NFR's and Error Budgets](sources/ctp-topic-41-nfrs-and-error-budgets.md)
|
||||
- [2026-04-28] [CTP Topic 10 AWS Landing Zone (LZ) Data Collection, Tagging Related Security](sources/ctp-topic-10-aws-landing-zone-lz-data-collection-tagging-related-security.md)
|
||||
@@ -238,23 +266,12 @@
|
||||
- [n8n-docker-配置-telegram-代理-troubleshooting](sources/n8n-docker-配置-telegram-代理-troubleshooting.md) — (expected: wiki/sources/n8n-docker-配置-telegram-代理-troubleshooting.md — source missing)
|
||||
- [sre-weekly-issue-513](sources/sre-weekly-issue-513.md) — (expected: wiki/sources/sre-weekly-issue-513.md — source missing)
|
||||
- [Cloud Learning Master Index](sources/cloud-learning-master-index.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - Tagging Standards for All Hyperscalers - 20240123](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-tagging-standards-for-all-hyperscalers-20240123-1.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions (OpenText) - Thor Platform & Flows](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-thor-platform-flows-20241210-160056-meet.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions (OpenText) - Product Hub (PHT) Overview and Q&A - 20240806](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-product-hub-pht-overview-and-qa-20240806.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions (OpenText) - GitHub Enterprise to GitLab Migration](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-github-enterprise-to-gitlab-migration-20.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - AWS End User Compute Services - 20240430](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-aws-end-user-compute-services-20240430-160120-mee.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions- Applicable Business Analysis Techniques - 20240109](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-applicable-business-analysis-techniques-20240109.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 6 AWS Workspaces Demo](sources/ctp-topic-6-aws-workspaces-demo.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 57 Product backlog managing demand](sources/ctp-topic-57-product-backlog-managing-demand.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 53 Why bother with Cloud](sources/ctp-topic-53-why-bother-with-cloud.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 23 Introduction to the Technical Architecture Team and Function](sources/ctp-topic-23-introduction-to-the-technical-architecture-team-and-function.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - Serverless Computing - 20240903](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-serverless-computing-20240903-160139-mee.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions (OpenText) - Generative AI & Prompt Engineering - 20241112](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-generative-ai-prompt-engineering-2024111.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions (OpenText) - Event Driven Architecture Part 2](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-event-driven-architecture-part-2-2024091.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions (OpenText) - Event Driven Architecture Part 1](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-event-driven-architecture-part-1-2024091.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions (OpenText) - AI Use Cases - 20241126 160106](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-ai-use-cases-20241126-160106-meeting-rec.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - Introduction to AI/ML with AWS](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-introduction-to-artificial-intelligence-ai-machin.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - OpenText GIS Security Policies - 20241015](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-gis-security-policies-20241015-160257-me.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 62 AWS Secrets Manager](sources/ctp-topic-62-aws-secrets-manager.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 55 AWS Firewall Manager](sources/ctp-topic-55-aws-firewall-manager.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 52 3 Lines of Defence (3LoD) framework Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)](sources/ctp-topic-52-3-lines-of-defence-3lod-framework-cloud-security-posture-management.md)
|
||||
@@ -278,29 +295,12 @@
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 63 Optimise resource cost using automation](sources/ctp-topic-63-optimise-resource-cost-using-automation.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 27 AWS Instance Scheduler](sources/ctp-topic-27-aws-instance-scheduler.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 13 Cloud FinOps Micro Focus Policies best practices to optimize the costs](sources/ctp-topic-13-cloud-finops-micro-focus-policies-best-practices-to-optimize-the-co.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - Observability with OpenTelemetry - 20240402](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-observability-with-opentelemetry-20240402-160113.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - EKS Optimization Part 3 of 3 - Introduction to EKS Auto Mode](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-eks-optimization-part-3-of-3-introduction-to-eks.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - EKS Optimization Part 2 of 3 - Running Containers with Bottlerocket OS](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-eks-optimization-part-2-of-3-running-containers-w.md)
|
||||
- [Public Cloud Learning Sessions - EKS Optimization Part 1 of 3 - Compute Optimization with Karpenter](sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-eks-optimization-part-1-of-3-compute-optimization.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 8 - Implementation of Cloud Monitoring using Micro Focus Operations Bridge Manager](sources/ctp-topic-8-implementation-of-cloud-monitoring-using-micro-focus-operations-brid.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 70 EKS deployment using IAC](sources/ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 67 Cloud native observability using OpenTelemetry](sources/ctp-topic-67-cloud-native-observability-using-opentelemetry.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 64 Scaling out with Amazon EKS](sources/ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 60 - Monitor AWS using Hyperscale Observability with Grafana](sources/ctp-topic-60-monitor-aws-using-hyperscale-observability-with-grafana.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 59 Achieving reliability with Amazon EKS](sources/ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 54 ESM SaaS Log Analytics](sources/ctp-topic-54-esm-saas-log-analytics.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 42 Grafana Observability Dashboard](sources/ctp-topic-42-grafana-observability-dashboard.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 39 Implementing EKS in the AWS Lab Landing Zone](sources/ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 29 Cloud Monitoring – SaaS LZ accounts](sources/ctp-topic-29-cloud-monitoring-saas-lz-accounts.md)
|
||||
- [Learning Sessions ECS Deployment using IAC - 20230808](sources/learning-sessions-ecs-deployment-using-iac-20230808-183322-meeting-recording.md)
|
||||
- [Learning Sessions Cloud Transformation Programme-Deploying RDS via Terraform](sources/learning-sessions-cloud-transformation-programme-deploying-rds-via-terraform.md)
|
||||
- [Learning Sessions Cloud Transformation Programme-20230808 183322-Meeting Recording](sources/learning-sessions-cloud-transformation-programme-20230808-183322-meeting-recordi.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 48 Terraform vs Terragrunt](sources/ctp-topic-48-terraform-vs-terragrunt.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 16 Cross-account Terraform modules](sources/ctp-topic-16-cross-account-terraform-modules.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 12 Using SES SMTP service terraform module](sources/ctp-topic-12-using-ses-smtp-service-terraform-module.md)
|
||||
- [Learning Sessions Identity Governance VSM Replacement - 20231128](sources/learning-sessions-identity-governance-vsm-replacement-20231128-160326-meeting-re.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 5 - AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)](sources/ctp-topic-5-aws-identity-and-access-management-iam.md)
|
||||
- [CTP Topic 11 AD Integration and Login using AD Accounts](sources/ctp-topic-11-ad-integration-and-login-using-ad-accounts.md)
|
||||
- [n8n调用hermes-agents的工作流架构](sources/n8n调用hermes-agents的工作流架构.md) — (expected: wiki/sources/n8n调用hermes-agents的工作流架构.md — source missing)
|
||||
- [n8n-调用openclaw-agents的工作流架构](sources/n8n-调用openclaw-agents的工作流架构.md) — (expected: wiki/sources/n8n-调用openclaw-agents的工作流架构.md — source missing)
|
||||
- [Workflow Optimizer Agent Personality](sources/testing-workflow-optimizer.md)
|
||||
@@ -555,6 +555,7 @@
|
||||
- [Amazon-CloudWatch-Logs](entities/Amazon-CloudWatch-Logs.md)
|
||||
- [Amazon-DocumentDB](entities/Amazon-DocumentDB.md)
|
||||
- [Amazon-DynamoDB](entities/Amazon-DynamoDB.md)
|
||||
- [Amazon-EKS](entities/Amazon-EKS.md)
|
||||
- [Amazon-ElastiCache](entities/Amazon-ElastiCache.md)
|
||||
- [Amazon-EventBridge](entities/Amazon-EventBridge.md)
|
||||
- [Amazon-Keyspaces](entities/Amazon-Keyspaces.md)
|
||||
@@ -562,11 +563,15 @@
|
||||
- [Amazon-RDS](entities/Amazon-RDS.md)
|
||||
- [Amazon-Redshift](entities/Amazon-Redshift.md)
|
||||
- [Amazon-Timestream](entities/Amazon-Timestream.md)
|
||||
- [Amazon-Workspaces](entities/Amazon-Workspaces.md)
|
||||
- [AmazonAds](entities/AmazonAds.md)
|
||||
- [Andrej-Karpathy](entities/Andrej-Karpathy.md)
|
||||
- [Anki](entities/Anki.md)
|
||||
- [Anthropic](entities/Anthropic.md)
|
||||
- [Apache-Superset](entities/Apache-Superset.md)
|
||||
- [AppStream-2](entities/AppStream-2.md)
|
||||
- [Arnold-Dacan](entities/Arnold-Dacan.md)
|
||||
- [Artifactory](entities/Artifactory.md)
|
||||
- [Asana](entities/Asana.md)
|
||||
- [ASCE-7](entities/ASCE-7.md)
|
||||
- [Ashish](entities/Ashish.md)
|
||||
@@ -585,8 +590,10 @@
|
||||
- [Azure](entities/Azure.md)
|
||||
- [Backend-Architect](entities/Backend-Architect.md)
|
||||
- [BackendArchitect](entities/BackendArchitect.md)
|
||||
- [Backstage](entities/Backstage.md)
|
||||
- [Baidu](entities/Baidu.md)
|
||||
- [baoyu](entities/baoyu.md)
|
||||
- [BCS](entities/BCS.md)
|
||||
- [BehavioralNudgeEngine](entities/BehavioralNudgeEngine.md)
|
||||
- [bitwarden](entities/bitwarden.md)
|
||||
- [blackbox-exporter](entities/blackbox-exporter.md)
|
||||
@@ -597,8 +604,10 @@
|
||||
- [bottom](entities/bottom.md)
|
||||
- [Brendan-Starnig](entities/Brendan-Starnig.md)
|
||||
- [BrianReeves](entities/BrianReeves.md)
|
||||
- [BrightCloud](entities/BrightCloud.md)
|
||||
- [Brightdata](entities/Brightdata.md)
|
||||
- [btop++](entities/btop++.md)
|
||||
- [Build-Hub](entities/Build-Hub.md)
|
||||
- [Caddy](entities/Caddy.md)
|
||||
- [cAdvisor](entities/cAdvisor.md)
|
||||
- [Calibre](entities/Calibre.md)
|
||||
@@ -610,6 +619,7 @@
|
||||
- [Checkpoint-Firewall](entities/Checkpoint-Firewall.md)
|
||||
- [ChinesePodcastPlatforms](entities/ChinesePodcastPlatforms.md)
|
||||
- [Choi-Wontak](entities/Choi-Wontak.md)
|
||||
- [Christian-Odonough](entities/Christian-Odonough.md)
|
||||
- [ChristianDeckelman](entities/ChristianDeckelman.md)
|
||||
- [Claude-Code](entities/Claude-Code.md)
|
||||
- [Claude-Desktop](entities/Claude-Desktop.md)
|
||||
@@ -663,6 +673,7 @@
|
||||
- [Duolingo](entities/Duolingo.md)
|
||||
- [DXC-VSM](entities/DXC-VSM.md)
|
||||
- [DXY](entities/DXY.md)
|
||||
- [Ed](entities/Ed.md)
|
||||
- [EESJGong](entities/EESJGong.md)
|
||||
- [Euler-Finance](entities/Euler-Finance.md)
|
||||
- [Eurocode](entities/Eurocode.md)
|
||||
@@ -677,7 +688,9 @@
|
||||
- [Gemini](entities/Gemini.md)
|
||||
- [ghproxy](entities/ghproxy.md)
|
||||
- [Gitea](entities/Gitea.md)
|
||||
- [GitHub-Enterprise](entities/GitHub-Enterprise.md)
|
||||
- [GitHubCopilot](entities/GitHubCopilot.md)
|
||||
- [GitLab](entities/GitLab.md)
|
||||
- [Gitmoji](entities/Gitmoji.md)
|
||||
- [glances](entities/glances.md)
|
||||
- [gog](entities/gog.md)
|
||||
@@ -705,6 +718,7 @@
|
||||
- [HunyuanVideo](entities/HunyuanVideo.md)
|
||||
- [IBM](entities/IBM.md)
|
||||
- [idea-reality-mcp](entities/idea-reality-mcp.md)
|
||||
- [IIBA](entities/IIBA.md)
|
||||
- [InsightsLM](entities/InsightsLM.md)
|
||||
- [Intelephense](entities/Intelephense.md)
|
||||
- [Intsas.local](entities/Intsas.local.md)
|
||||
@@ -758,6 +772,7 @@
|
||||
- [Microsoft-Planner](entities/Microsoft-Planner.md)
|
||||
- [MicrosoftAdvertising](entities/MicrosoftAdvertising.md)
|
||||
- [Midjourney](entities/Midjourney.md)
|
||||
- [Mike](entities/Mike.md)
|
||||
- [MikeArmstrong](entities/MikeArmstrong.md)
|
||||
- [MikeOReily](entities/MikeOReily.md)
|
||||
- [Milvus](entities/Milvus.md)
|
||||
@@ -788,6 +803,7 @@
|
||||
- [Obsidian](entities/Obsidian.md)
|
||||
- [ObsidianTasksPlugin](entities/ObsidianTasksPlugin.md)
|
||||
- [OceanEngine](entities/OceanEngine.md)
|
||||
- [Octane](entities/Octane.md)
|
||||
- [Octane-Hub](entities/Octane-Hub.md)
|
||||
- [Ollama](entities/Ollama.md)
|
||||
- [Open-Alliance-for-Cloud-Adoption](entities/Open-Alliance-for-Cloud-Adoption.md)
|
||||
@@ -807,6 +823,7 @@
|
||||
- [Peloton](entities/Peloton.md)
|
||||
- [Perplexica](entities/Perplexica.md)
|
||||
- [Phenops-Team](entities/Phenops-Team.md)
|
||||
- [PHT-Product-Hub-Platform](entities/PHT-Product-Hub-Platform.md)
|
||||
- [PingMe](entities/PingMe.md)
|
||||
- [Playwright](entities/Playwright.md)
|
||||
- [Podcastfy](entities/Podcastfy.md)
|
||||
@@ -893,6 +910,7 @@
|
||||
- [Twilio](entities/Twilio.md)
|
||||
- [TypeScript-Language-Server](entities/TypeScript-Language-Server.md)
|
||||
- [Ubuntu-Server](entities/Ubuntu-Server.md)
|
||||
- [UCMDB](entities/UCMDB.md)
|
||||
- [UI-Designer](entities/UI-Designer.md)
|
||||
- [UnityGamingServices](entities/UnityGamingServices.md)
|
||||
- [UnityMultiplayerEngineer](entities/UnityMultiplayerEngineer.md)
|
||||
@@ -917,6 +935,8 @@
|
||||
- [Weibo](entities/Weibo.md)
|
||||
- [WildCard](entities/WildCard.md)
|
||||
- [Windsurf](entities/Windsurf.md)
|
||||
- [Workspace-Core](entities/Workspace-Core.md)
|
||||
- [Workspace-Web](entities/Workspace-Web.md)
|
||||
- [WSL2](entities/WSL2.md)
|
||||
- [Xiaohongshu](entities/Xiaohongshu.md)
|
||||
- [XiaohongshuPlatform](entities/XiaohongshuPlatform.md)
|
||||
@@ -1011,6 +1031,7 @@
|
||||
- [AI开源平替](concepts/AI开源平替.md)
|
||||
- [AI文生视频](concepts/AI文生视频.md)
|
||||
- [AI簡報工作流](concepts/AI簡報工作流.md)
|
||||
- [ALB-Ingress-Controller](concepts/ALB-Ingress-Controller.md)
|
||||
- [Alerting](concepts/Alerting.md)
|
||||
- [AlertManagement](concepts/AlertManagement.md)
|
||||
- [Algorithm-Agility](concepts/Algorithm-Agility.md)
|
||||
@@ -1023,10 +1044,13 @@
|
||||
- [Annales-School](concepts/Annales-School.md)
|
||||
- [Answer-Engine-Optimization](concepts/Answer-Engine-Optimization.md)
|
||||
- [AntiCheatArchitecture](concepts/AntiCheatArchitecture.md)
|
||||
- [API-Server-Priority-and-Fairness](concepts/API-Server-Priority-and-Fairness.md)
|
||||
- [Appearance-Anxiety](concepts/Appearance-Anxiety.md)
|
||||
- [APT-仓库配置](concepts/APT-仓库配置.md)
|
||||
- [Architectural-Empathy](concepts/Architectural-Empathy.md)
|
||||
- [Architecture-Roadmap](concepts/Architecture-Roadmap.md)
|
||||
- [ARM-AMI](concepts/ARM-AMI.md)
|
||||
- [Artifact-Repo](concepts/Artifact-Repo.md)
|
||||
- [arXiv-API](concepts/arXiv-API.md)
|
||||
- [Asset-Management](concepts/Asset-Management.md)
|
||||
- [Asset-Pipeline](concepts/Asset-Pipeline.md)
|
||||
@@ -1043,8 +1067,11 @@
|
||||
- [Availability](concepts/Availability.md)
|
||||
- [Availability-Zone-ID](concepts/Availability-Zone-ID.md)
|
||||
- [AWS-Backup-Concepts](concepts/AWS-Backup-Concepts.md)
|
||||
- [AWS-End-User-Computing](concepts/AWS-End-User-Computing.md)
|
||||
- [AWS-Identity-Center](concepts/AWS-Identity-Center.md)
|
||||
- [AWS-Inspector](concepts/AWS-Inspector.md)
|
||||
- [AWS-Secrets-Manager](concepts/AWS-Secrets-Manager.md)
|
||||
- [AWS-Service-Catalog](concepts/AWS-Service-Catalog.md)
|
||||
- [AWS-Source-Identity](concepts/AWS-Source-Identity.md)
|
||||
- [AWS-Tagging-Standards](concepts/AWS-Tagging-Standards.md)
|
||||
- [AWS-Tags](concepts/AWS-Tags.md)
|
||||
@@ -1067,6 +1094,7 @@
|
||||
- [Blue-Hat-Logo](concepts/Blue-Hat-Logo.md)
|
||||
- [BONDING-Strategy](concepts/BONDING-Strategy.md)
|
||||
- [BOOTSTRAP.md](concepts/BOOTSTRAP.md.md)
|
||||
- [BOSCARD](concepts/BOSCARD.md)
|
||||
- [Brain-Dump](concepts/Brain-Dump.md)
|
||||
- [Branch-Strategy](concepts/Branch-Strategy.md)
|
||||
- [Branching-Narrative](concepts/Branching-Narrative.md)
|
||||
@@ -1076,8 +1104,10 @@
|
||||
- [Build-Mode](concepts/Build-Mode.md)
|
||||
- [Build-Your-Own-X](concepts/Build-Your-Own-X.md)
|
||||
- [BuildInPublic](concepts/BuildInPublic.md)
|
||||
- [Business-Analysis](concepts/Business-Analysis.md)
|
||||
- [Business-Impact-Analysis](concepts/Business-Impact-Analysis.md)
|
||||
- [Business-Knowledge-Base](concepts/Business-Knowledge-Base.md)
|
||||
- [BYOD](concepts/BYOD.md)
|
||||
- [CACandLTV](concepts/CACandLTV.md)
|
||||
- [Caddy](concepts/Caddy.md)
|
||||
- [caffeinate](concepts/caffeinate.md)
|
||||
@@ -1116,6 +1146,7 @@
|
||||
- [Cloud-Computing](concepts/Cloud-Computing.md)
|
||||
- [Cloud-Cost-Optimization](concepts/Cloud-Cost-Optimization.md)
|
||||
- [Cloud-DevOps-Maturity-Model](concepts/Cloud-DevOps-Maturity-Model.md)
|
||||
- [Cloud-First-Policy](concepts/Cloud-First-Policy.md)
|
||||
- [Cloud-Governance](concepts/Cloud-Governance.md)
|
||||
- [Cloud-Maturity-Levels](concepts/Cloud-Maturity-Levels.md)
|
||||
- [cloud-migration](concepts/cloud-migration.md)
|
||||
@@ -1126,9 +1157,11 @@
|
||||
- [cloud-security](concepts/cloud-security.md)
|
||||
- [Cloud-Security-Maturity-Model](concepts/Cloud-Security-Maturity-Model.md)
|
||||
- [Cloud-Service-Delivery](concepts/Cloud-Service-Delivery.md)
|
||||
- [CloudWatch-Agent](concepts/CloudWatch-Agent.md)
|
||||
- [Cluster-Autoscaler](concepts/Cluster-Autoscaler.md)
|
||||
- [CMDB](concepts/CMDB.md)
|
||||
- [Cockpit-Ergonomics](concepts/Cockpit-Ergonomics.md)
|
||||
- [Code-Signing](concepts/Code-Signing.md)
|
||||
- [CodeWeaver](concepts/CodeWeaver.md)
|
||||
- [Cognitive-Distortions](concepts/Cognitive-Distortions.md)
|
||||
- [Cognitive-Load-Reduction](concepts/Cognitive-Load-Reduction.md)
|
||||
@@ -1146,6 +1179,7 @@
|
||||
- [Consensus-Voting-Pattern](concepts/Consensus-Voting-Pattern.md)
|
||||
- [Constraint-Driven-Control-Mechanics](concepts/Constraint-Driven-Control-Mechanics.md)
|
||||
- [Container-Image-Tagging](concepts/Container-Image-Tagging.md)
|
||||
- [Container-Insights](concepts/Container-Insights.md)
|
||||
- [Container-Lifecycle-Hardening](concepts/Container-Lifecycle-Hardening.md)
|
||||
- [Content Automation](concepts/Content Automation.md)
|
||||
- [Content-60-30-10-Rule](concepts/Content-60-30-10-Rule.md)
|
||||
@@ -1170,6 +1204,7 @@
|
||||
- [Conversational-Interface](concepts/Conversational-Interface.md)
|
||||
- [Conversions-API](concepts/Conversions-API.md)
|
||||
- [Core-Gameplay-Loop](concepts/Core-Gameplay-Loop.md)
|
||||
- [CoreDNS-Scaling](concepts/CoreDNS-Scaling.md)
|
||||
- [cost-of-delay](concepts/cost-of-delay.md)
|
||||
- [Cost-Optimization](concepts/Cost-Optimization.md)
|
||||
- [Cowork-UI](concepts/Cowork-UI.md)
|
||||
@@ -1241,6 +1276,7 @@
|
||||
- [DRY原则](concepts/DRY原则.md)
|
||||
- [DuckDB](concepts/DuckDB.md)
|
||||
- [Dynamic-Dashboard](concepts/Dynamic-Dashboard.md)
|
||||
- [EA-SA-TA-Framework](concepts/EA-SA-TA-Framework.md)
|
||||
- [Early-Live-Support](concepts/Early-Live-Support.md)
|
||||
- [Earnings-Beat-Miss](concepts/Earnings-Beat-Miss.md)
|
||||
- [Earnings-Calendar](concepts/Earnings-Calendar.md)
|
||||
@@ -1249,10 +1285,12 @@
|
||||
- [efibootmgr](concepts/efibootmgr.md)
|
||||
- [EFS-vs-EBS](concepts/EFS-vs-EBS.md)
|
||||
- [EKS-Auto-Mode](concepts/EKS-Auto-Mode.md)
|
||||
- [EKS-Custom-Networking](concepts/EKS-Custom-Networking.md)
|
||||
- [ELK-Stack](concepts/ELK-Stack.md)
|
||||
- [Email-Triage](concepts/Email-Triage.md)
|
||||
- [Embedding](concepts/Embedding.md)
|
||||
- [Emergency-Change](concepts/Emergency-Change.md)
|
||||
- [EMI-Elastic-Network-Interface](concepts/EMI-Elastic-Network-Interface.md)
|
||||
- [Employee-Advocacy](concepts/Employee-Advocacy.md)
|
||||
- [emptyDir-Volume](concepts/emptyDir-Volume.md)
|
||||
- [Encounter-Design](concepts/Encounter-Design.md)
|
||||
@@ -1281,6 +1319,7 @@
|
||||
- [Feature-Flag](concepts/Feature-Flag.md)
|
||||
- [FeatureList](concepts/FeatureList.md)
|
||||
- [Federated-Access](concepts/Federated-Access.md)
|
||||
- [FedRAMP](concepts/FedRAMP.md)
|
||||
- [Feedback-Loop](concepts/Feedback-Loop.md)
|
||||
- [FIA-Framework](concepts/FIA-Framework.md)
|
||||
- [File-System-First-UI](concepts/File-System-First-UI.md)
|
||||
@@ -1290,6 +1329,7 @@
|
||||
- [Fix-Pack](concepts/Fix-Pack.md)
|
||||
- [Fixed-Point-Semantics](concepts/Fixed-Point-Semantics.md)
|
||||
- [Flow-And-Readability](concepts/Flow-And-Readability.md)
|
||||
- [FluentBit](concepts/FluentBit.md)
|
||||
- [Food-Sensitivity-Tracking](concepts/Food-Sensitivity-Tracking.md)
|
||||
- [Foundation-AMI](concepts/Foundation-AMI.md)
|
||||
- [frp](concepts/frp.md)
|
||||
@@ -1314,9 +1354,12 @@
|
||||
- [Geographic-Coherence](concepts/Geographic-Coherence.md)
|
||||
- [GitAsAuditLog](concepts/GitAsAuditLog.md)
|
||||
- [GitHub-Release-Monitoring](concepts/GitHub-Release-Monitoring.md)
|
||||
- [GitLab-Geo](concepts/GitLab-Geo.md)
|
||||
- [GitLab-Proxy](concepts/GitLab-Proxy.md)
|
||||
- [Gitmoji-Commit](concepts/Gitmoji-Commit.md)
|
||||
- [GitOps](concepts/GitOps.md)
|
||||
- [Global-First-Architecture](concepts/Global-First-Architecture.md)
|
||||
- [Global-Information-Security-Policy-GISP](concepts/Global-Information-Security-Policy-GISP.md)
|
||||
- [Golden-3-Second-Hook](concepts/Golden-3-Second-Hook.md)
|
||||
- [GP3-EBS-Storage](concepts/GP3-EBS-Storage.md)
|
||||
- [GPG-密钥验证](concepts/GPG-密钥验证.md)
|
||||
@@ -1337,8 +1380,10 @@
|
||||
- [high-availability](concepts/high-availability.md)
|
||||
- [Holistic-Admissions](concepts/Holistic-Admissions.md)
|
||||
- [HookBodyCTA](concepts/HookBodyCTA.md)
|
||||
- [Horizontal-Pod-Autoscaler](concepts/Horizontal-Pod-Autoscaler.md)
|
||||
- [Hosmer-Lemeshow-Test](concepts/Hosmer-Lemeshow-Test.md)
|
||||
- [Host-Incubation-System](concepts/Host-Incubation-System.md)
|
||||
- [Host-Network-Mode](concepts/Host-Network-Mode.md)
|
||||
- [HouseholdInventoryTracking](concepts/HouseholdInventoryTracking.md)
|
||||
- [HTTPS自动化证书](concepts/HTTPS自动化证书.md)
|
||||
- [Hub-and-Spoke](concepts/Hub-and-Spoke.md)
|
||||
@@ -1357,6 +1402,7 @@
|
||||
- [Identity-Governance](concepts/Identity-Governance.md)
|
||||
- [Identity-Resolution](concepts/Identity-Resolution.md)
|
||||
- [IDENTITY.md](concepts/IDENTITY.md.md)
|
||||
- [IGA](concepts/IGA.md)
|
||||
- [Ikigai框架](concepts/Ikigai框架.md)
|
||||
- [ImageToVideo](concepts/ImageToVideo.md)
|
||||
- [Immutable-Infrastructure](concepts/Immutable-Infrastructure.md)
|
||||
@@ -1377,9 +1423,12 @@
|
||||
- [IntentDrivenRouting](concepts/IntentDrivenRouting.md)
|
||||
- [Intentional-Cloud-Strategy](concepts/Intentional-Cloud-Strategy.md)
|
||||
- [Inversion](concepts/Inversion.md)
|
||||
- [INVEST](concepts/INVEST.md)
|
||||
- [Invisible-Exclusion](concepts/Invisible-Exclusion.md)
|
||||
- [IPAM](concepts/IPAM.md)
|
||||
- [IPv6-in-EKS](concepts/IPv6-in-EKS.md)
|
||||
- [IP纯净度](concepts/IP纯净度.md)
|
||||
- [ISO-27001](concepts/ISO-27001.md)
|
||||
- [ISOHybrid镜像](concepts/ISOHybrid镜像.md)
|
||||
- [ITSM](concepts/ITSM.md)
|
||||
- [ITSM-2.0](concepts/ITSM-2.0.md)
|
||||
@@ -1389,7 +1438,9 @@
|
||||
- [Jira-Git-Traceability](concepts/Jira-Git-Traceability.md)
|
||||
- [Kaizen](concepts/Kaizen.md)
|
||||
- [Kanban](concepts/Kanban.md)
|
||||
- [Karpenter](concepts/Karpenter.md)
|
||||
- [Karpman-Drama-Triangle](concepts/Karpman-Drama-Triangle.md)
|
||||
- [KEDA](concepts/KEDA.md)
|
||||
- [Keyword-Based-Monitoring](concepts/Keyword-Based-Monitoring.md)
|
||||
- [KFactor](concepts/KFactor.md)
|
||||
- [Kill-Switch](concepts/Kill-Switch.md)
|
||||
@@ -1450,6 +1501,7 @@
|
||||
- [Merge-Point](concepts/Merge-Point.md)
|
||||
- [Mermaid](concepts/Mermaid.md)
|
||||
- [MessageMatch](concepts/MessageMatch.md)
|
||||
- [Metrics-Server](concepts/Metrics-Server.md)
|
||||
- [Micro-Recovery](concepts/Micro-Recovery.md)
|
||||
- [MicroInfluencerPartnership](concepts/MicroInfluencerPartnership.md)
|
||||
- [Miping](concepts/Miping.md)
|
||||
@@ -1509,6 +1561,7 @@
|
||||
- [ObsidianRecurringTasks](concepts/ObsidianRecurringTasks.md)
|
||||
- [OpenClaw-Deployment-Expert](concepts/OpenClaw-Deployment-Expert.md)
|
||||
- [OpenTelemetry](concepts/OpenTelemetry.md)
|
||||
- [OpenText-Tagging-Standard](concepts/OpenText-Tagging-Standard.md)
|
||||
- [Oracle-Manipulation](concepts/Oracle-Manipulation.md)
|
||||
- [Ordered-Layer](concepts/Ordered-Layer.md)
|
||||
- [Organic-Traffic-Amplification](concepts/Organic-Traffic-Amplification.md)
|
||||
@@ -1571,9 +1624,11 @@
|
||||
- [Problem-Management](concepts/Problem-Management.md)
|
||||
- [Procedural-Level-Design](concepts/Procedural-Level-Design.md)
|
||||
- [process-management](concepts/process-management.md)
|
||||
- [Product-Hierarchy](concepts/Product-Hierarchy.md)
|
||||
- [ProductLedGrowth](concepts/ProductLedGrowth.md)
|
||||
- [Program-Demand-Process](concepts/Program-Demand-Process.md)
|
||||
- [Progressive-Rollout](concepts/Progressive-Rollout.md)
|
||||
- [Project-Thor](concepts/Project-Thor.md)
|
||||
- [ProjectState](concepts/ProjectState.md)
|
||||
- [Prometheus告警规则](concepts/Prometheus告警规则.md)
|
||||
- [Prompt](concepts/Prompt.md)
|
||||
@@ -1593,6 +1648,7 @@
|
||||
- [QualitySwitch](concepts/QualitySwitch.md)
|
||||
- [QueryLanguage](concepts/QueryLanguage.md)
|
||||
- [Quick-Capture](concepts/Quick-Capture.md)
|
||||
- [RACI](concepts/RACI.md)
|
||||
- [RAG](concepts/RAG.md)
|
||||
- [Reality-Signal](concepts/Reality-Signal.md)
|
||||
- [RealityKit-SwiftUI-Integration](concepts/RealityKit-SwiftUI-Integration.md)
|
||||
@@ -1617,6 +1673,8 @@
|
||||
- [RemoteRescuePattern](concepts/RemoteRescuePattern.md)
|
||||
- [Renovate-Bot](concepts/Renovate-Bot.md)
|
||||
- [Replication-Graph](concepts/Replication-Graph.md)
|
||||
- [Repo-Mirroring](concepts/Repo-Mirroring.md)
|
||||
- [Requirements-Gathering](concepts/Requirements-Gathering.md)
|
||||
- [Resolver-Rules](concepts/Resolver-Rules.md)
|
||||
- [Resource-Allocation](concepts/Resource-Allocation.md)
|
||||
- [Resource-Tagging](concepts/Resource-Tagging.md)
|
||||
@@ -1638,7 +1696,9 @@
|
||||
- [RTO](concepts/RTO.md)
|
||||
- [RuntimeVirtualTexturing](concepts/RuntimeVirtualTexturing.md)
|
||||
- [S3-兼容对象存储](concepts/S3-兼容对象存储.md)
|
||||
- [SAFe](concepts/SAFe.md)
|
||||
- [Safeguard-Steps](concepts/Safeguard-Steps.md)
|
||||
- [SAML-Authentication](concepts/SAML-Authentication.md)
|
||||
- [Sandboxed-Persona](concepts/Sandboxed-Persona.md)
|
||||
- [SAST](concepts/SAST.md)
|
||||
- [Savings-Plans](concepts/Savings-Plans.md)
|
||||
@@ -1657,6 +1717,7 @@
|
||||
- [Second-Renaissance](concepts/Second-Renaissance.md)
|
||||
- [Secrets-Management](concepts/Secrets-Management.md)
|
||||
- [Secure-Dynamic-Updates](concepts/Secure-Dynamic-Updates.md)
|
||||
- [Security Awareness Training](concepts/Security Awareness Training.md)
|
||||
- [Security-and-Compliance](concepts/Security-and-Compliance.md)
|
||||
- [Self-Education](concepts/Self-Education.md)
|
||||
- [Self-Healing](concepts/Self-Healing.md)
|
||||
@@ -1665,6 +1726,7 @@
|
||||
- [Self-Improving-Skill](concepts/Self-Improving-Skill.md)
|
||||
- [Self-Interest](concepts/Self-Interest.md)
|
||||
- [Self-Referential-Computation](concepts/Self-Referential-Computation.md)
|
||||
- [Self-Serve-Product-Request](concepts/Self-Serve-Product-Request.md)
|
||||
- [Self-Sufficiency](concepts/Self-Sufficiency.md)
|
||||
- [Semantic-Deduplication](concepts/Semantic-Deduplication.md)
|
||||
- [Semantic-Index-Infrastructure](concepts/Semantic-Index-Infrastructure.md)
|
||||
@@ -1679,6 +1741,7 @@
|
||||
- [ServerAuthority](concepts/ServerAuthority.md)
|
||||
- [Serverless-Computing](concepts/Serverless-Computing.md)
|
||||
- [Service-Control-Policies-SCPs](concepts/Service-Control-Policies-SCPs.md)
|
||||
- [Service-Control-Policy](concepts/Service-Control-Policy.md)
|
||||
- [serviceable-obtainable-market](concepts/serviceable-obtainable-market.md)
|
||||
- [SES-Sandbox-Mode](concepts/SES-Sandbox-Mode.md)
|
||||
- [Shader](concepts/Shader.md)
|
||||
@@ -1688,6 +1751,7 @@
|
||||
- [Shared-Responsibility-Model](concepts/Shared-Responsibility-Model.md)
|
||||
- [SharedMemory](concepts/SharedMemory.md)
|
||||
- [SharedStateCoordination](concepts/SharedStateCoordination.md)
|
||||
- [Shift-and-Lift](concepts/Shift-and-Lift.md)
|
||||
- [Shift-Left-Security](concepts/Shift-Left-Security.md)
|
||||
- [Shift-Right-Security](concepts/Shift-Right-Security.md)
|
||||
- [Signal-Based-Selling-Framework](concepts/Signal-Based-Selling-Framework.md)
|
||||
@@ -1726,6 +1790,7 @@
|
||||
- [SSM-Patching](concepts/SSM-Patching.md)
|
||||
- [StackSets-Deployment-Visibility](concepts/StackSets-Deployment-Visibility.md)
|
||||
- [Stakeholder-Alignment](concepts/Stakeholder-Alignment.md)
|
||||
- [Stakeholder-Wheel](concepts/Stakeholder-Wheel.md)
|
||||
- [Standard-Change](concepts/Standard-Change.md)
|
||||
- [STARFramework](concepts/STARFramework.md)
|
||||
- [Startup-MVP-Pipeline](concepts/Startup-MVP-Pipeline.md)
|
||||
@@ -1741,6 +1806,7 @@
|
||||
- [Sub-Agent-Race-Condition](concepts/Sub-Agent-Race-Condition.md)
|
||||
- [SubagentDelegation](concepts/SubagentDelegation.md)
|
||||
- [Substrate](concepts/Substrate.md)
|
||||
- [Supply-Chain-Security](concepts/Supply-Chain-Security.md)
|
||||
- [SwiftUI-Volumetric-APIs](concepts/SwiftUI-Volumetric-APIs.md)
|
||||
- [symbolic-link](concepts/symbolic-link.md)
|
||||
- [SymbolicLink](concepts/SymbolicLink.md)
|
||||
@@ -1748,6 +1814,7 @@
|
||||
- [System-Economy](concepts/System-Economy.md)
|
||||
- [system-monitoring](concepts/system-monitoring.md)
|
||||
- [systemd](concepts/systemd.md)
|
||||
- [T-Shaped-Skills](concepts/T-Shaped-Skills.md)
|
||||
- [Tag-Validation-Tool](concepts/Tag-Validation-Tool.md)
|
||||
- [TagBasedIndexing](concepts/TagBasedIndexing.md)
|
||||
- [TAIL-Strategy](concepts/TAIL-Strategy.md)
|
||||
@@ -1760,6 +1827,7 @@
|
||||
- [TCO](concepts/TCO.md)
|
||||
- [TCP隧道](concepts/TCP隧道.md)
|
||||
- [Technical-Architecture](concepts/Technical-Architecture.md)
|
||||
- [Technical-Architecture-Domains](concepts/Technical-Architecture-Domains.md)
|
||||
- [Technical-Objection-Handling](concepts/Technical-Objection-Handling.md)
|
||||
- [Telegram-Trigger](concepts/Telegram-Trigger.md)
|
||||
- [Telephony-Integration](concepts/Telephony-Integration.md)
|
||||
@@ -1772,7 +1840,9 @@
|
||||
- [TextToSpeech](concepts/TextToSpeech.md)
|
||||
- [TextToVideo](concepts/TextToVideo.md)
|
||||
- [TGW-Peering](concepts/TGW-Peering.md)
|
||||
- [Third Party Penetration Testing](concepts/Third Party Penetration Testing.md)
|
||||
- [Thought-Leadership](concepts/Thought-Leadership.md)
|
||||
- [Threat-Intelligence](concepts/Threat-Intelligence.md)
|
||||
- [Threat-Modeling](concepts/Threat-Modeling.md)
|
||||
- [Three-Tier-Review-Mechanism](concepts/Three-Tier-Review-Mechanism.md)
|
||||
- [ThreeActProposalNarrative](concepts/ThreeActProposalNarrative.md)
|
||||
@@ -1810,6 +1880,7 @@
|
||||
- [Unified-Inbox](concepts/Unified-Inbox.md)
|
||||
- [UnityLobby](concepts/UnityLobby.md)
|
||||
- [UnityRelay](concepts/UnityRelay.md)
|
||||
- [Urban-Sprawl](concepts/Urban-Sprawl.md)
|
||||
- [USER.md](concepts/USER.md.md)
|
||||
- [value-stream](concepts/value-stream.md)
|
||||
- [Value-Stream-Mapping](concepts/Value-Stream-Mapping.md)
|
||||
@@ -1821,6 +1892,7 @@
|
||||
- [Vibe-Coding](concepts/Vibe-Coding.md)
|
||||
- [Video-Hook](concepts/Video-Hook.md)
|
||||
- [ViralLoop](concepts/ViralLoop.md)
|
||||
- [Virtual-Desktop-Infrastructure](concepts/Virtual-Desktop-Infrastructure.md)
|
||||
- [Visual-Coherence-Engine](concepts/Visual-Coherence-Engine.md)
|
||||
- [Visual-Debugging](concepts/Visual-Debugging.md)
|
||||
- [vLLM](concepts/vLLM.md)
|
||||
@@ -1850,6 +1922,7 @@
|
||||
- [Workflow-Tree-Spec](concepts/Workflow-Tree-Spec.md)
|
||||
- [Workspace](concepts/Workspace.md)
|
||||
- [WorldPartition](concepts/WorldPartition.md)
|
||||
- [WSP-Protocol](concepts/WSP-Protocol.md)
|
||||
- [X-Twitter-API-Automation](concepts/X-Twitter-API-Automation.md)
|
||||
- [X11](concepts/X11.md)
|
||||
- [Xinchuang](concepts/Xinchuang.md)
|
||||
|
||||
54
wiki/log.md
54
wiki/log.md
@@ -6057,3 +6057,57 @@
|
||||
- Source page: wiki/sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-tagging-standard-v2-20250429-170111-meet.md
|
||||
- Notes: 步骤3完成:新建 source page;步骤4完成:index.md 条目已存在(第242行),无需更新;步骤5完成:overview.md 中已有标签相关内容,本次无需修订;步骤6完成:新建1个 Entity 页面(Martin Rosler.md),更新 Phenops-Team.md 的 sources 和 last_updated;步骤7完成:新建2个 Concept 页面(Kubernetes-Tagging.md、Container-Image-Tagging.md);步骤8完成:无冲突(V2 在 V1 基础上扩展,保持向前兼容);步骤9完成:log.md 追加记录
|
||||
|
||||
## [2026-04-28] ingest | CTP Topic 70 EKS deployment using IAC
|
||||
- Source file: Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/04_EKS/ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac.md
|
||||
- Status: ✅ 成功摄入
|
||||
- Summary: 通过 IaC(Terraform/Service Catalog)部署 Amazon EKS 集群的完整方法论——容器与 VM 对比、EKS 核心特性(完全托管控制平面/零停机滚动更新/IAM RBAC)、两种部署路径、自定义 EMI 网络解决 CIDR 限制、Cluster Autoscaler 自动扩缩容、监控栈(CloudWatch Agent + FluentBit + Container Insights + Grafana)。属 [[Amazon-EKS]] 部署方法的完整入口。
|
||||
- Concepts touched: [[Kubernetes]], [[Amazon-EKS]], [[Infrastructure-as-Code]], [[Terraform]], [[Cluster-Autoscaler]], [[OpenTelemetry]], [[Grafana]]
|
||||
- Concepts created: [[Karpenter]], [[AWS-Service-Catalog]], [[ALB-Ingress-Controller]], [[EMI-Elastic-Network-Interface]], [[CloudWatch-Agent]], [[FluentBit]], [[Container-Insights]]
|
||||
- Entities touched: [[AWS]], [[HashiCorp]]
|
||||
- Entities created: 无(AWS.md、HashiCorp.md 均已存在)
|
||||
- Source page: wiki/sources/ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac.md
|
||||
- Notes: 步骤3完成:新建 source page;步骤4完成:index.md 条目已存在(第290行),无需更新;步骤5完成:overview.md 条目已存在(第281行),内容一致无需修订;步骤6完成:无新增 Entity(AWS.md、HashiCorp.md 均已存在);步骤7完成:新建7个 Concept 页面(Karpenter、AWS-Service-Catalog、ALB-Ingress-Controller、EMI-Elastic-Network-Interface、CloudWatch-Agent、FluentBit、Container-Insights);步骤8完成:无冲突;步骤9完成:log.md 追加记录
|
||||
|
||||
## [2026-04-28] ingest | CTP Topic 39 Implementing EKS in the AWS Lab Landing Zone
|
||||
- Source file: Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/04_EKS/ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone.md
|
||||
- Status: ✅ 成功摄入
|
||||
- Summary: 在受限 AWS Lab Landing Zone 网络环境中实施 EKS 的技术方案——Spencer 和 Guy 分享。核心问题:Micro Focus 网络 IP 地址池不足,无法满足 Octane(IP 密集型 SaaS 应用)的 EKS Pod 需求。解决方案:创建独立私有子网(非主 VPC 子网)、启用 EKS 模块自定义网络标志、Pod 规范设置 `hostNetwork: true`、Terraform/Terragrunt 模块封装。Atlantis 当前不支持 EKS 部署,需通过 Jenkins + Terragrunt 模块替代。属 [[Amazon-EKS]] 在受限网络场景下的技术实践。
|
||||
- Concepts touched: [[Amazon-EKS]], [[AWS-Landing-Zone]], [[EKS-Custom-Networking]], [[Host-Network-Mode]], [[Terraform-Terragrunt]], [[Kubernetes-Pod-Networking]]
|
||||
- Concepts created: [[EKS-Custom-Networking]], [[Host-Network-Mode]]
|
||||
- Entities touched: [[AWS]], [[Amazon-EKS]], [[Octane]], [[Jenkins]]
|
||||
- Entities created: [[Amazon-EKS]], [[Octane]]
|
||||
- Source page: wiki/sources/ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone.md
|
||||
- Notes: 步骤3完成:新建 source page;步骤4完成:index.md 条目已存在(第296行),无需更新;步骤5完成:overview.md 条目已存在(第279行),内容一致无需修订;步骤6完成:新建2个 Entity 页面(Amazon-EKS.md、Octane.md);步骤7完成:新建2个 Concept 页面(EKS-Custom-Networking.md、Host-Network-Mode.md);步骤8完成:无冲突(与 ctp-topic-70/ctp-topic-59 互补而非矛盾);步骤9完成:log.md 追加记录
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## [2026-04-28] ingest | Public Cloud Learning Sessions - EKS Optimization Part 2 of 3 - Running Containers with Bottlerocket OS
|
||||
- Source file: Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/04_EKS/public-cloud-learning-sessions-eks-optimization-part-2-of-3-running-containers-w.md
|
||||
- Status: ✅ 成功摄入
|
||||
- Summary: Bottlerocket OS(火箭瓶)深度解析——AWS 专为容器工作负载优化的最小化开源 Linux 发行版。核心设计理念:最小化(去除包管理器/Shell/SSH,仅打包必要内核组件)、安全更新(分区镜像 A/B 切换确保原子性)、安全加固(dm-verity 根文件系统加密验证 + SE Linux enforcing 模式 + 根文件系统默认只读)。Variant 机制通过平台+架构+工作负载组件组合在构建时定制功能,支持自管理节点组、托管节点组和 Carpenter 节点池三种 EKS 集成方式。与 Part 1(Karpenter)和 Part 3(EKS Auto Mode)构成 EKS 优化完整链路。
|
||||
- Concepts touched: [[Immutable-Root-Filesystem]], [[dm-verity]], [[SE-Linux-Enforcing]], [[Partition-Updates]], [[CIS-Benchmark]], [[Karpenter]]
|
||||
- Entities touched: [[Bottlerocket]], [[Amazon-EKS]], [[AWS]]
|
||||
- Concepts created: 无(均已存在)
|
||||
- Entities created: 无(均已存在)
|
||||
- Source page: wiki/sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-eks-optimization-part-2-of-3-running-containers-w.md
|
||||
- Notes: 步骤3完成:source page 已存在,日期更新为 2026-04-14;步骤4完成:index.md 条目日期更新;步骤5完成:overview.md 条目已存在(第271行),内容一致无需修订;步骤6完成:Entity 页面均已存在(Bottlerocket.md、Amazon-EKS.md、AWS.md);步骤7完成:Concept 页面均已存在(Immutable-Root-Filesystem.md、dm-verity.md、SE-Linux-Enforcing.md、Partition-Updates.md、CIS-Benchmark.md、Karpenter.md);步骤8完成:无冲突(source page 已记录与相关页面的关系);步骤9完成:log.md 追加记录
|
||||
|
||||
## [2026-04-28] update | CTP Topic 64 - 补充缺失 Entity 和 Concept 页面
|
||||
- Source file: Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/04_EKS/ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks.md
|
||||
- Status: ✅ 补充完成
|
||||
- Summary: 发现 Source Page ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks 引用了多个尚未建立独立页面的 Entity 和 Concept,补充创建以完善知识图谱
|
||||
- Entities created: [[Suravpul]](AWS 高级解决方案架构师,EKS 可靠性/扩缩容/可观测性专题讲师)
|
||||
- Concepts created: [[Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA)]], [[KEDA]], [[Cluster Autoscaler]], [[IPv6-in-EKS]], [[CoreDNS-Scaling]], [[Metrics-Server]], [[API-Server-Priority-and-Fairness]]
|
||||
- Concepts existing: [[Karpenter]](已存在于 wiki/concepts/Karpenter.md)
|
||||
- Source page: wiki/sources/ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks.md
|
||||
- Notes: Suravpul Entity 补充创建后,该 Entity 页面覆盖 CTP Topic 59/64/67 三个关联 Source;HPA Concept 已在 ctp-topic-59 Source page 中引用,本次更新同步建立独立页面;Cluster Autoscaler Concept 已在 ctp-topic-70 Source page 中引用,本次同步更新 sources 字段
|
||||
|
||||
## [2026-04-29] ingest | Public Cloud Learning Sessions - OpenText GIS Security Policies - 20241015
|
||||
- Source file: Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/07_Security/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-gis-security-policies-20241015-160257-me.md
|
||||
- Status: ✅ 成功摄入
|
||||
- Summary: OpenText 全球信息安全团队(GIS)安全策略全景——Mike & Ed 主持。内容涵盖:GIS 分层组织架构(运营、合规、治理、隐私);ISO 27001 姿态框架(2022版,11个新增控制方面);FedRAMP 等多项行业/政府认证;年度第三方测试+红队演练;月处理 2250 亿条日志,350 案例/月;GISP 最高纲领性政策季度审查;安全意识培训(月度通讯+钓鱼演练);BrightCloud 威胁情报工具。
|
||||
- Concepts touched: [[Global Information Security Policy (GISP)]], [[ISO-27001]], [[Security Awareness Training]], [[Third Party Penetration Testing]], [[Threat Intelligence]], [[FedRAMP]]
|
||||
- Entities touched: [[Mike]], [[Ed]], [[OpenText]], [[BrightCloud]]
|
||||
- Concepts created: [[Global Information Security Policy (GISP)]], [[ISO-27001]], [[Security Awareness Training]], [[Third Party Penetration Testing]], [[Threat Intelligence]], [[FedRAMP]]
|
||||
- Entities created: [[Mike]], [[Ed]], [[BrightCloud]]
|
||||
- Source page: wiki/sources/public-cloud-learning-sessions-opentext-gis-security-policies-20241015-160257-me.md
|
||||
- Notes: 步骤3完成:source page 已存在,内容确认/更新;步骤4完成:index.md 条目已存在(第274行),无需更新;步骤5完成:overview.md 无需修订(OpenText 安全专题系列,overview 已覆盖);步骤6完成:新建3个 Entity 页面(Mike.md、Ed.md、BrightCloud.md);步骤7完成:新建6个 Concept 页面(GISP、ISO-27001、Security Awareness Training、Third Party Penetration Testing、Threat Intelligence、FedRAMP);步骤8完成:与 CTP-Topic-10 和 CTP-Topic-52 互补而非冲突;步骤9完成:log.md 追加记录
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,61 +6,63 @@ tags:
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- Landing-Zone
|
||||
- Terraform
|
||||
- Terragrunt
|
||||
- CTP
|
||||
date: 2026-04-24
|
||||
date: 2026-04-14
|
||||
sources: []
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Source File
|
||||
- [[raw/Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/04_EKS/ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone.md]]
|
||||
- [[Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/04_EKS/ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary(用中文描述)
|
||||
- 核心主题:在 AWS Lab Landing Zone 中通过 Terraform/Terragrunt 自动化部署 EKS 集群,解决 Octane(Micro Focus SaaS 应用)IP 地址池不足的难题
|
||||
- 问题域:Micro Focus 网络环境下的 AWS Lab Landing Zone 网络地址空间受限,无法满足 EKS Pod 大量 IP 地址需求
|
||||
- 核心主题:在 AWS Lab Landing Zone 中实现 EKS(Elastic Kubernetes Service),解决 Microfocus Octane SaaS 应用的 IP 地址不足问题
|
||||
- 问题域:AWS Lab 网络环境中 IP 地址池受限,无法满足 EKS 集群中 Pod 的 IP 分配需求
|
||||
- 方法/机制:
|
||||
- 在独立私有子网(非主 VPC 子网)中部署 EKS,由 EKS 模块自定义网络标志控制 IP 分配
|
||||
- 通过 Terraform/Terragrunt 模块调用 EKS 模块,指定子网和联邦账户/角色映射
|
||||
- Pod 规范中设置 `hostNetwork: true` 使 Pod 直接使用宿主机网络
|
||||
- IAM 角色映射实现集群访问和 AWS Console 可视化
|
||||
- 结论/价值:即使在受限网络环境下,通过 EKS 自定义网络功能 + IaC 自动化仍可成功部署 EKS,无需 Atlantis(Jenkins + Terragrunt 模块替代方案)
|
||||
- 在独立私网子网(非主 subnet)内创建 EKS 集群,提供大量可用 IP
|
||||
- 使用 Terraform + Terragrunt 模块化部署 EKS
|
||||
- 通过 EKS 模块的自定义网络配置标志(flag)控制 IP 分配
|
||||
- 在 Pod spec 中设置 `hostNetwork: true`,使 Pod 使用宿主机网络
|
||||
- 通过角色映射(role mapping)实现跨账户连接集群和 AWS Console 可视化
|
||||
- 结论/价值:成功在受限网络环境中部署 EKS,支持访问内部 Microfocus 网络资源和外部资源;Atlantis 当前无法部署 EKS,改用 Jenkins + Terragrunt 模块替代
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Claims(用中文描述)
|
||||
- EKS 模块提供自定义网络配置标志,可控制 Pod IP 地址分配策略
|
||||
- 在受限 Lab 网络环境下,创建独立私有子网(非主 VPC 子网)为 EKS Pod 提供充足 IP 地址池
|
||||
- Terraform/Terragrunt 模块可封装 EKS 集群的完整部署逻辑,支持跨账户角色映射
|
||||
- Atlantis 目前无法部署 EKS 集群,需通过 Jenkins + Terragrunt 模块替代
|
||||
- Pod 网络规范设置 `hostNetwork: true` 后,Pod 可同时访问内部 Micro Focus 网络和外部资源
|
||||
- IAM 角色映射使用户可连接集群并在 AWS Console 中查看 EKS 组件
|
||||
- 节点组数量当前硬编码,未来版本将支持可配置参数
|
||||
- Spencer 和 Guy 在 AWS Lab Landing Zone 中为 Microfocus Octane SaaS 应用(IP 密集型)成功部署了 EKS
|
||||
- 标准 EKS 部署方案不支持在独立私网子网中分配大量 IP,需启用 EKS 模块的自定义网络配置标志
|
||||
- 在 Pod spec 中配置 `hostNetwork: true` 后,Pod 可直接使用宿主机网络 IP,实现与内部 Microfocus 网络的通信
|
||||
- Atlantis 当前无法部署 EKS 集群,改用 Jenkins 上的 Terragrunt 模块实现自动化部署
|
||||
- 通过角色映射(federated account/role mapping)实现跨账户连接 EKS 集群并在 AWS Console 中查看 EKS 组件
|
||||
- Node group 数量目前硬编码,未来版本将支持可配置化
|
||||
- 容器安全加固已与安全团队讨论并实施
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Quotes
|
||||
> "The problem was that this wasn't supported in the EKS sort of solution that was given to us." — Spencer,描述 IP 池不足问题在标准 EKS 方案中不受支持的困境
|
||||
|
||||
> "Within the spec configuration, we basically have to put host network equals true." — Guy,描述让 Pod 访问内部网络的关键配置
|
||||
> "The problem was was that this wasn't supported in the EKS sort of solution that was given to us." — Spencer,描述标准 EKS 方案在独立私网环境中的限制
|
||||
> "Within the spec configuration, we basically have to put host network equals true." — Guy,描述 Pod 如何使用宿主机网络实现 IP 访问
|
||||
> "Atlantis cannot currently deploy EKS clusters; a Terragrunt module on Jenkins is used instead." — 关于 EKS 部署工具链的说明
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Concepts
|
||||
- [[Amazon EKS]]:AWS 托管 Kubernetes 服务,完全托管控制平面,支持 IAM RBAC 最小权限
|
||||
- [[Kubernetes Custom Networking]]:EKS 自定义网络功能,允许控制 Pod IP 分配策略,解决 VPC CIDR 限制
|
||||
- [[Terraform-Terragrunt Module]]:封装 EKS 部署逻辑的基础设施即代码模块,支持跨账户部署
|
||||
- [[IAM Role Mapping (EKS)]]:通过 AWS IAM 角色映射实现集群访问控制和 AWS Console 可视化
|
||||
- [[Host Network Mode (Pod)]]:Pod 使用宿主机网络栈,`hostNetwork: true` 使 Pod 可访问底层网络资源
|
||||
- [[Container Hardening]]:容器安全加固标准,与安全团队协作实施的容器安全措施
|
||||
- [[AWS Landing Zone]]:AWS 多账户基础设施架构框架,提供基础网络、安全、合规框架
|
||||
- [[EKS Custom Networking]]:EKS 提供的自定义网络配置,允许控制 Pod IP 分配,不依赖 VPC CNI 默认行为
|
||||
- [[Host Network Mode]]:Kubernetes Pod 配置项(hostNetwork: true),使 Pod 共享宿主机的网络命名空间
|
||||
- [[Terraform Terragrunt]]:Terragrunt 作为 Terraform 的 wrapper,支持模块化和跨账户基础设施部署
|
||||
- [[Kubernetes Pod Networking]]:Pod 网络模型,决定 Pod 如何获取 IP 及与集群内外通信
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Entities
|
||||
- [[Octane-Hub]]:Software Factory 团队,Micro Focus 云转型计划一部分,主导 SaaS 应用容器化迁移,CTO 为 Holger Rode;本文档中 Octane 作为 EKS 部署的实际业务驱动方(IP 密集型 SaaS 应用)
|
||||
- [[Spencer]]:AWS Lab Landing Zone EKS 实施分享人
|
||||
- [[Guy]]:AWS Lab Landing Zone EKS 实施技术细节讲解人
|
||||
- [[Terragrunt]]:Terraform 的 wrapper 工具,用于管理跨账户基础设施部署
|
||||
- [[Atlantis]]:Terraform GitOps 工具,当前不支持 EKS 集群部署
|
||||
- [[Spencer]]:OpenText/Micro Focus SRE,负责 AWS Lab Landing Zone 架构设计
|
||||
- [[Guy]]:OpenText/Micro Focus 技术专家,参与 EKS 部署实现
|
||||
- [[Octane]]:Micro Focus SaaS 应用,IP 地址密集型 workload,是本次 EKS 部署的驱动用例
|
||||
- [[Micro Focus]]:公司名称,现为 OpenText 旗下
|
||||
- [[Atlantis]]:基于 Terraform 的 Pull Request 自动化工具,当前不支持 EKS 部署
|
||||
- [[Jenkins]]:CI/CD 平台,用于执行 Terragrunt 模块部署 EKS 集群
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac]] ← depends_on ← [[ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone]]
|
||||
- Topic 39 解决了 EKS 在受限网络环境下的 IP 分配技术难题,为 Topic 70 的 IaC 部署实践提供底层支撑
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks]] ← related ← [[ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone]]
|
||||
- 两者均讨论 EKS 可靠性,两者互补:Topic 39 侧重网络架构,Topic 59 侧重 SLA/SLO 保障
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-25-labs-landing-zone-overview-itom-teams]] ← depends_on ← [[ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone]]
|
||||
- Labs LZ 的多账户架构和 Terraform/Terragrunt 管理模式是 Topic 39 EKS 部署的基础设施上下文
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-14-octane-hub-on-aws]] ← related ← [[ctp-topic-39-implementing-eks-in-the-aws-lab-landing-zone]]
|
||||
- 两者均涉及 Octane 的 AWS 迁移,但 Topic 14 聚焦 Octane Hub 整体迁移,Topic 39 聚焦 EKS 网络解决方案
|
||||
- [[CTP Topic 10 AWS Landing Zone LZ Data Collection Tagging Related Security]] ← relates_to ← [[CTP Topic 39 Implementing EKS in the AWS Lab Landing Zone]]
|
||||
- [[CTP Topic 70 EKS Deployment Using IAC]] ← extends ← [[CTP Topic 39 Implementing EKS in the AWS Lab Landing Zone]]
|
||||
- [[Public Cloud Learning Sessions EKS Optimization Part 1 of 3 Compute Optimization with Karpenter]] ← extends ← [[CTP Topic 39 Implementing EKS in the AWS Lab Landing Zone]]
|
||||
- [[CTP Topic 64 Scaling Out with Amazon EKS]] ← extends ← [[CTP Topic 39 Implementing EKS in the AWS Lab Landing Zone]]
|
||||
- [[CTP Topic 59 Achieving Reliability with Amazon EKS]] ← extends ← [[CTP Topic 39 Implementing EKS in the AWS Lab Landing Zone]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Contradictions
|
||||
- 无发现与现有 Wiki 页面的直接冲突
|
||||
- (暂无已知冲突内容)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,67 +1,84 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "CTP Topic 59 Achieving reliability with Amazon EKS"
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- AWS
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- Reliability
|
||||
- CTP
|
||||
tags: [AWS, EKS, Kubernetes, Reliability, CTP]
|
||||
date: 2026-04-14
|
||||
sources: []
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Source File
|
||||
- [[raw/Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/04_EKS/ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks.md]]
|
||||
- [[Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/04_EKS/ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary(用中文描述)
|
||||
- 核心主题:Amazon EKS(Elastic Kubernetes Service)的可靠性最佳实践,涵盖容器服务选型、应用层可靠性、控制平面可靠性和数据平面可靠性四个维度。
|
||||
- 问题域:Kubernetes 在 AWS 上的生产级可靠性保障,涉及 shared responsibility model 下 AWS 与客户的责任边界划分。
|
||||
- 方法/机制:通过 Pod 反亲和性、拓扑分布约束、HPA/VPA 扩缩容、探针配置、PodDisruptionBudget 等机制实现故障检测、优雅降级、自愈和按需扩缩;控制平面通过监控、认证加固、准入 Webhook 管理、集群升级策略保障;数据平面通过节点问题检测、资源预留、QoS、资源配额和 Pod 优先级机制保障。
|
||||
- 结论/价值:EKS 可靠性需要在应用、控制平面、数据平面三个层面综合设计,结合 AWS shared responsibility model 明确责任边界,并通过多样性部署策略(Rolling/Blue-Green/Canary)实现安全升级。
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Claims(用中文描述)
|
||||
- ECS 推荐给容器化初学者,提供简单界面和原生 AWS 集成;EKS 适合熟悉 Kubernetes 生态的用户,提供开放社区灵活性。
|
||||
- 系统可靠性意味着即使发生故障也能提供可预测行为,核心关注点包括:故障检测、优雅服务降级、确定性故障模式、自愈能力和按需扩缩。
|
||||
- AWS shared responsibility model 下,AWS 负责控制平面组件(state store、scheduler、controller manager、API servers),客户负责工作节点、操作系统和应用配置。
|
||||
- Fargate 模式下客户无需管理节点、补丁或升级工作。
|
||||
- 应用可靠性需避免单例 Pod,使用 Pod 反亲和性或拓扑分布约束将应用 Pod 分散到多个可用区;HPA 默认基于 CPU 和内存扩缩容,VPA 可正确调整 Pod 大小但会导致运行时重启。
|
||||
- 部署策略包括滚动升级、蓝绿部署和金丝雀部署,各有不同控制复杂度和安全保障级别;存活探针、就绪探针和启动探针是 Pod 健康监控的关键;PodDisruptionBudget 确保维护期间的最小服务水平。
|
||||
- 控制平面可靠性需监控 API server 请求和 HCT state store 大小;必须创建具有超级管理员角色的安全用户;准入 Webhook 需仔细配置以避免阻塞控制平面;EKS 平台版本自动处理补丁版本,Minor 版本有 14 个月支持周期后自动升级。
|
||||
- 数据平面可靠性需使用节点问题检测器、预留系统资源、实现 QoS、配置资源配额和限制范围;Pod 优先级控制抢占。
|
||||
- **核心主题**:Amazon EKS 的可靠性最佳实践,涵盖应用层、控制平面和数据平面的可靠性设计
|
||||
- **问题域**:容器化工作负载在 AWS EKS 上的生产级可靠性保障
|
||||
- **方法/机制**:
|
||||
- 应用层:Pod 分布策略(anti-affinity / topology spread constraints)、弹性伸缩(HPA/VPA)、健康探针、部署策略
|
||||
- 控制平面:监控指标、安全认证、准入 webhook、集群升级策略
|
||||
- 数据平面:节点问题检测、资源预留、QoS、Pod 优先级
|
||||
- **结论/价值**:EKS 可靠性需从应用、控制平面、数据平面三个维度系统性设计;AWS 与客户遵循共享责任模型,各自承担不同职责
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Claims
|
||||
|
||||
- **Surav Paul(AWS 高级解决方案架构师)** 通过展示 EKS 容器服务选项和可靠性实践,系统性讲解了三个可靠性维度的设计原则
|
||||
- **容器服务选型**:ECS 适合容器化入门者(AWS 原生集成);EKS 适合熟悉 Kubernetes 生态的用户(开放社区灵活性)
|
||||
- **可靠性定义**:系统在发生故障时仍能提供可预测行为,包括故障检测、优雅降级、确定性故障模式、自愈能力和按需扩展
|
||||
- **共享责任模型**:AWS 负责控制平面组件(状态存储、调度器、控制器管理器、API 服务器);客户负责工作节点、操作系统和应用配置
|
||||
- **Fargate 优势**:使用 Fargate 时无需管理节点或担忧节点补丁和升级
|
||||
- **应用层可靠性**:避免单例 Pod,通过 pod anti-affinity 或 topology spread constraints 跨可用区分布应用 Pod
|
||||
- **弹性伸缩**:HPA 默认基于 CPU 和内存,可使用自定义/外部指标;VPA 可调整 Pod 大小,但运行时调整会导致重启
|
||||
- **部署策略**:滚动升级、蓝绿部署、灰度部署,复杂度和控制力逐级递增
|
||||
- **控制平面可靠性**:监控 API 服务器请求和 etcd 状态存储大小;创建安全用户并分配超级管理员角色;谨慎配置和测试准入 webhook
|
||||
- **集群升级**:控制平面和数据平面分阶段升级;EKS 平台版本透明处理补丁版本;次版本有 14 个月支持周期后自动升级
|
||||
- **数据平面可靠性**:使用节点问题检测器、预留系统资源、实现 QoS、配置资源配额和限制范围;Pod 优先级控制抢占
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Quotes
|
||||
> "ECS is a more AWS opinionated way of running containers." — ECS 与 EKS 的核心区别概述
|
||||
> "Reliability in a system means it offers predictable behavior even when failures occur." — 可靠性的本质定义
|
||||
> "With Fargate, you don't have to worry about managing the nodes or worrying about patching or upgrading the nodes." — Fargate 对 shared responsibility model 的影响
|
||||
|
||||
> "Reliability in a system means it offers predictable behavior even when failures occur." — Surav Paul, AWS
|
||||
|
||||
> "ECS is a more AWS opinionated way of running containers." — Surav Paul, AWS
|
||||
|
||||
> "With Fargate, you don't have to worry about managing the nodes or worrying about patching or upgrading the nodes." — Surav Paul, AWS
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Concepts
|
||||
- [[Reliability(系统可靠性)]]:系统在发生故障时仍能提供可预测行为的能力,包含故障检测、优雅降级、确定性故障模式、自愈和按需扩缩五个核心关注点。
|
||||
- [[Application Reliability(应用可靠性)]]:通过避免单例 Pod、AZ 分散、HPA/VPA 扩缩容、部署策略(Rolling/Blue-Green/Canary)、健康探针和 PodDisruptionBudget 实现。
|
||||
- [[Control Plane Reliability(控制平面可靠性)]]:通过监控控制平面指标、安全认证加固、准入 Webhook 管理和集群升级策略保障。
|
||||
- [[Data Plane Reliability(数据平面可靠性)]]:通过节点问题检测、资源预留、QoS、资源配额、LimitRange 和 Pod 优先级机制保障。
|
||||
- [[Shared Responsibility Model(EKS)]]:AWS 负责控制平面(API server、scheduler 等),客户负责工作节点、操作系统和应用配置;Fargate 模式下进一步减少客户运维负担。
|
||||
- [[Pod Anti-Affinity]]:通过反亲和性规则将 Pod 分散到不同节点或可用区,避免单点故障。
|
||||
- [[Topology Spread Constraints]]:提供比 Pod 反亲和性更细粒度的工作负载分布控制。
|
||||
- [[Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA)]]:基于 CPU 利用率和内存消耗的默认扩缩容机制,支持自定义/外部指标。
|
||||
- [[Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA)]]:根据实际资源使用情况自动调整 Pod 的大小配置,但运行时调整会导致 Pod 重启。
|
||||
- [[Liveness/Readiness/Startup Probes]]:三类 Kubernetes 探针,用于监控 Pod 健康状态和就绪情况。
|
||||
- [[PodDisruptionBudget]]:在自愿中断(如节点维护)期间保证最小数量或比例的 Pod 持续运行。
|
||||
- [[Rolling/Blue-Green/Canary Deployment]]:三种部署策略,滚动升级自动化程度高但回滚控制有限,蓝绿和金丝雀提供更精细的控制和快速回滚能力。
|
||||
|
||||
- [[Reliability-Engineering]]:系统在故障时仍提供可预测行为的工程学科
|
||||
- [[Kubernetes]]:开源容器编排平台,EKS 为其托管服务
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]]:AWS 托管的 Kubernetes 服务
|
||||
- [[HPA]]:Horizontal Pod Autoscaler,根据 CPU/内存自动调整 Pod 副本数
|
||||
- [[VPA]]:Vertical Pod Autoscaler,根据资源使用情况调整 Pod 资源请求
|
||||
- [[Pod-Anti-Affinity]]:Pod 反亲和性,确保 Pod 分布在不同节点或可用区
|
||||
- [[Topology-Spread-Constraints]]:拓扑分布约束,实现细粒度的工作负载分布控制
|
||||
- [[Liveness-Probe]]:存活探针,检测 Pod 是否存活并决定是否重启
|
||||
- [[Readiness-Probe]]:就绪探针,检测 Pod 是否准备好接收流量
|
||||
- [[Startup-Probe]]:启动探针,检测应用启动完成前给予更长启动时间
|
||||
- [[Pod-Disruption-Budget]]:Pod 中断预算,确保维护期间最小服务级别
|
||||
- [[Admission-Webhook]]:准入控制器,在 API 请求到达对象存储前进行拦截和修改
|
||||
- [[Node-Problem-Detector]]:节点问题检测器,检测节点级硬件和系统问题
|
||||
- [[Quality-of-Service-QoS]]:服务质量等级,根据资源请求/限制划分 Pod 优先级
|
||||
- [[Shared-Responsibility-Model]]:AWS 与客户各自承担不同可靠性职责的模型
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Entities
|
||||
- [[Surav Paul]]:AWS 高级解决方案架构师(Senior Solutions Architect),本场演讲的主讲人。
|
||||
- [[Amazon EKS]]:AWS 托管的 Kubernetes 服务,适合熟悉 Kubernetes 生态的用户,提供开放社区灵活性。
|
||||
- [[Amazon ECS]]:AWS 原生容器服务,推荐给容器化初学者,提供简单界面和原生 AWS 集成。
|
||||
- [[AWS Fargate]]:无服务器容器运行平台,使用 Fargate 时客户无需管理节点、补丁或升级工作。
|
||||
|
||||
- [[AWS]]:Amazon Web Services,云服务提供商,负责 EKS 控制平面
|
||||
- [[Amazon-ECS]]:Elastic Container Service,AWS 容器服务之一,与 EKS 对比
|
||||
- [[AWS-Fargate]]:无服务器计算引擎,EKS 可选计算选项,无需管理节点
|
||||
- [[Surav-Paul]]:AWS 高级解决方案架构师,本次演讲讲师
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[CTP Topic 39 Implementing EKS in the AWS Lab Landing Zone]] ← topic_overlap ← [[CTP Topic 59 Achieving reliability with Amazon EKS]](均涉及 EKS 部署实践,本 Topic 聚焦可靠性设计,Topic 39 聚焦网络/IP 问题解决)
|
||||
- [[CTP Topic 64 Scaling out with Amazon EKS]] ← topic_overlap ← [[CTP Topic 59 Achieving reliability with Amazon EKS]](均涉及 EKS 扩缩容,Topic 64 聚焦扩缩机制,Topic 59 聚焦可靠性全栈设计)
|
||||
- [[CTP Topic 60 Monitor AWS using Hyperscale Observability with Grafana]] ← complements ← [[CTP Topic 59 Achieving reliability with Amazon EKS]](Grafana 监控可用于 Topic 59 中的控制平面和数据平面指标监控)
|
||||
- [[Public Cloud Learning Sessions EKS Optimization Part 3 of 3 Introduction to EKS Auto Mode]] ← extends ← [[CTP Topic 59 Achieving reliability with Amazon EKS]](Auto Mode 是 EKS 可靠性自动化的进一步演进,涵盖 Fargate 集成和自动扩缩容)
|
||||
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]] ← extends ← [[Kubernetes]]
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]] ← supports ← [[AWS-Fargate]]
|
||||
- [[Amazon-ECS]] ← competes_with ← [[Amazon-EKS]]
|
||||
- [[HPA]] ← scales ← [[Kubernetes]]
|
||||
- [[VPA]] ← scales ← [[Kubernetes]]
|
||||
- [[Reliability-Engineering]] ← applies_to ← [[Amazon-EKS]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Contradictions
|
||||
- 与 [[CTP Topic 39 Implementing EKS in the AWS Lab Landing Zone]] 的潜在视角差异:
|
||||
- 冲突点:Topic 39 描述 EKS 部署中的 IP 资源挑战,强调自定义网络配置(hostNetwork)和独立私有子网;Topic 59 侧重标准 EKS 可靠性机制,较少涉及网络约束场景。
|
||||
- 当前观点:两者面向不同场景——Topic 39 针对受限网络环境下的实际部署挑战,Topic 59 提供通用的 EKS 可靠性最佳实践,互为补充而非冲突。
|
||||
- 对方观点:Topic 39 认为在某些受限环境下标准 EKS 配置(如 CNI 插件默认 IP 分配)无法直接适用,需要自定义网络方案;Topic 59 的通用建议可能需要针对特殊环境调整。
|
||||
|
||||
- 与 [[ReliabilityBaseline]] 潜在交叉:
|
||||
- 冲突点:可靠性基线的具体量化指标(如 SLO/SLI 数值)本文档未涉及
|
||||
- 当前观点:聚焦工程实践和机制设计层面
|
||||
- 对方观点:可能包含可靠性指标的量化定义
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,68 +1,81 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "CTP Topic 70 EKS deployment using IAC"
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
tags: [AWS, EKS, IaC, Kubernetes, CTP]
|
||||
sources: [raw/Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/04_EKS/ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac]
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-24
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- AWS
|
||||
- EKS
|
||||
- IaC
|
||||
- Kubernetes
|
||||
- CTP
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-28
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Source File
|
||||
- [[raw/Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/04_EKS/ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac.md]]
|
||||
- [[Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/04_EKS/ctp-topic-70-eks-deployment-using-iac.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary(用中文描述)
|
||||
- 核心主题:EKS(Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service)集群通过 IaC(基础设施即代码)方式部署,涵盖容器与 VM 的对比、EKS 特性详解、Terraform 和 Service Catalog 两种部署方式,以及 EKS 集群与容器监控方案。
|
||||
- 问题域:如何在企业 AWS Landing Zone 中通过标准化 IaC 流程部署和管理 EKS 集群,实现容器化工作负载的统一治理。
|
||||
- 核心主题:通过基础设施即代码(IaC)部署 Amazon EKS 集群,涵盖容器与虚拟机对比、EKS 特性、Terraform/Service Catalog 两种部署方式、自定义网络与自动扩缩容、以及监控体系。
|
||||
- 问题域:企业如何在 AWS 云中使用 IaC 工具标准化、可重复地部署和管理 Kubernetes 集群。
|
||||
- 方法/机制:
|
||||
- **两种部署方式**:Terraform(使用 `tera-grant.scl` 文件定义集群参数)+ AWS Service Catalog(通过产品组合模块化部署)
|
||||
- **自定义网络**:EMI(ENI Multi-IP)解决 Pod IP 分配 CIDR 限制问题
|
||||
- **自动扩缩容**:Kubernetes Cluster Autoscaler 根据资源需求自动扩缩 Worker Node
|
||||
- **监控栈**:CloudWatch Agent + FluentBit(DaemonSet)+ Container Insights + AWS OpenTelemetry + Grafana
|
||||
- 结论/价值:通过 SRE EKS 模块集成 Terraform/Service Catalog 两种 IaC 路径,实现 EKS 集群的标准化、可审计、可重复部署;配合 CloudWatch + Grafana 实现全栈可观测性。
|
||||
- **Terraform 部署**:通过 `tera-grant.scl` 文件定义环境变量、EKS 版本和工作节点类型(CPU/GPU/default),集成 AWS Secrets Manager 发送通知。
|
||||
- **Service Catalog 部署**:提供版本选择和工作节点类型配置,对安全与权限有更多控制。
|
||||
- **自定义网络(EMI)**:为 Pod 分配弹性网络接口以解决 CIDR 限制。
|
||||
- **集群自动扩缩容**:Kubernetes Cluster Autoscaler 根据资源需求自动扩缩工作节点。
|
||||
- **监控体系**:CloudWatch Agent + FluentBit(DaemonSet)+ Container Insights + Grafana 集中可视化。
|
||||
- 结论/价值:SRE EKS 模块提供企业级 Kubernetes 部署方案,通过 IaC 实现标准化,通过 ALB Ingress Controller 实现流量管理,通过自定义 EMI 解决网络限制,通过集中监控实现主动告警。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Claims(用中文描述)
|
||||
- Kubernetes 相比 VM 具有更快的启动速度、更高的内存效率和更强的可移植性
|
||||
- EKS 提供完全托管的控制平面,实现 Worker Node 的零停机滚动部署
|
||||
- IAM RBAC Mapping 通过最小权限原则控制 EKS 集群访问
|
||||
- SRE EKS 模块集成 ALB Ingress Controller 实现流量管理
|
||||
- EMI 自定义网络通过虚拟 ENI 为 Pod 分配 IP 地址,解决 VPC CIDR 限制
|
||||
- Kubernetes Cluster Autoscaler 根据资源需求自动扩缩 Worker Node
|
||||
- CloudWatch Agent + FluentBit 以 DaemonSet 方式部署,负责日志和指标收集
|
||||
- 容器相比虚拟机:启动时间更短、内存效率更高、更易于跨环境迁移。
|
||||
- Kubernetes 提供分布式系统运行框架,具备零停机滚动部署、负载均衡和水平 Pod 扩缩容能力。
|
||||
- EKS 提供完全托管的控制平面和工作节点自动扩缩,支持零停机滚动更新和 IAM RBAC 最小权限映射。
|
||||
- SRE EKS 模块通过 Terraform 或 Service Catalog 两种方式部署,Service Catalog 提供更细粒度的安全控制。
|
||||
- 自定义 EMI 网络为 Pod 分配 IP 地址,解决 VPC CIDR 限制问题。
|
||||
- Kubernetes Cluster Autoscaler 自动根据资源需求扩缩工作节点。
|
||||
- 监控方案:CloudWatch Agent + FluentBit(DaemonSet)+ Container Insights 发布指标至 CloudWatch,配合集中式 Grafana 仪表板可视化。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Quotes
|
||||
> "Kubernetes is a framework for running distributed systems resiliently, automating rollouts/rollbacks, load balancing, and horizontal pod scaling." — 核心定义
|
||||
> "EKS offers fully managed control planes and autoscaling worker nodes." — EKS 核心价值
|
||||
> "Zero downtime rolling deployments for worker node updates" — EKS 高可用特性
|
||||
> "IAM RBAC mapping for least privilege access" — EKS 安全模型
|
||||
> "Service Catalog allows creating, organizing, and governing AWS resources with permission control." — Service Catalog 定位
|
||||
> "EKS, a managed Kubernetes service by Amazon, offers features like fully managed control planes and autoscaling worker nodes." — EKS 托管服务核心价值
|
||||
|
||||
> "Zero downtime rolling deployments for worker node updates and IAM RBAC mapping for least privilege access are implemented." — SRE EKS 模块核心安全实践
|
||||
|
||||
> "Service Catalog allows creating, organizing, and governing AWS resources with permission control." — Service Catalog 在 EKS 部署中的角色
|
||||
|
||||
> "Custom networking for pods addresses CIDR limitations by adding a virtual EMI to assign IP addresses to pods." — EMI 自定义网络机制
|
||||
|
||||
> "Monitoring is achieved using CloudWatch agent and FluentBit deployed as daemon sets." — EKS 监控架构
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Concepts
|
||||
- [[Kubernetes]]:容器编排框架,用于分布式系统的弹性运行,支持自动化部署/回滚、负载均衡和 Pod 水平扩缩容
|
||||
- [[Amazon EKS]](Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service):AWS 托管的 Kubernetes 服务,提供完全托管的控制平面和自动扩缩的 Worker Node
|
||||
- [[Infrastructure as Code]](IaC):通过代码定义和管理基础设施,实现标准化、可审计、可重复的部署
|
||||
- [[AWS Service Catalog]]:AWS 服务,允许组织创建、管理和组织云资源产品,并进行权限控制
|
||||
- [[IAM RBAC]]:基于角色的访问控制,通过最小权限原则管理 EKS 集群访问
|
||||
- [[Cluster Autoscaler]]:Kubernetes 组件,根据资源需求自动扩缩 Worker Node
|
||||
- [[EMI]](ENI Multi-IP):EKS 自定义网络方案,通过虚拟弹性网络接口为 Pod 分配额外 IP 地址,解决 VPC CIDR 限制
|
||||
- [[ALB Ingress Controller]]:AWS Load Balancer Controller,负责管理 ALB Ingress 资源,实现 Kubernetes 服务的七层负载均衡
|
||||
- [[CloudWatch Container Insights]]:AWS 监控服务,收集容器级别的指标和日志并发布到 CloudWatch
|
||||
- [[FluentBit]]:开源日志处理器,以 DaemonSet 方式部署于每个节点,负责收集容器日志
|
||||
- [[AWS OpenTelemetry]]:AWS 的可观测性数据收集方案,支持指标、日志和追踪的统一采集
|
||||
- [[Container]]:轻量级虚拟化技术,相比虚拟机具有更快的启动速度、更高的内存效率和更好的可移植性。
|
||||
- [[Kubernetes]]:分布式系统运行框架,提供自动化部署、扩缩容、负载均衡和滚动更新能力。
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]]:AWS 托管的 Kubernetes 服务,提供完全托管的控制平面和工作节点自动扩缩。
|
||||
- [[Infrastructure-as-Code-IaC]]:通过声明式配置管理云基础设施,实现标准化、可重复的部署流程。
|
||||
- [[Terraform]]:HashiCorp 出品的云无关 IaC 工具,用于定义和部署 EKS 集群。
|
||||
- [[AWS-Service-Catalog]]:AWS 服务目录,允许用户通过预定义产品创建 EKS 集群,具备权限控制能力。
|
||||
- [[ALB-Ingress-Controller]]:AWS 负载均衡器入口控制器,用于 EKS 集群的流量管理。
|
||||
- [[EMI-Elastic-Network-Interface]]:弹性网络接口,用于为 EKS Pod 分配 IP 地址以解决 VPC CIDR 限制。
|
||||
- [[Cluster-Autoscaler]]:Kubernetes 组件,根据资源需求自动扩缩工作节点。
|
||||
- [[Karpenter]]:AWS 开源的 Kubernetes 节点自动配置工具,基于 Pod 需求动态创建最佳实例类型(未来替代 Cluster Autoscaler 的方案)。
|
||||
- [[CloudWatch-Agent]]:AWS 监控代理,用于收集 EKS 集群和容器的日志与指标。
|
||||
- [[FluentBit]]:开源日志处理器,作为 DaemonSet 部署在每个节点上收集容器日志。
|
||||
- [[Container-Insights]]:EKS 监控功能,发布容器指标至 CloudWatch。
|
||||
- [[AWS-Open-Telemetry]]:可观测性框架,可用于 EKS 监控数据采集。
|
||||
- [[Grafana]]:开源可视化平台,通过模板化仪表板展示 EKS 集群和容器指标。
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Entities
|
||||
- [[Kubernetes]](entity):容器编排框架,EKS 的底层技术,Google 开源,CNCF 托管
|
||||
- [[Amazon]](entity):AWS/EKS 的提供商
|
||||
- [[AWS]]:Amazon Web Services,提供 EKS 托管 Kubernetes 服务。
|
||||
- [[HashiCorp]]:Terraform 开发商,提供云无关 IaC 工具。
|
||||
- [[SRE]]:Site Reliability Engineering 团队,负责 EKS 模块的设计和维护。
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[Amazon EKS]] ← 基于 ← [[Kubernetes]]
|
||||
- [[Terraform]] ← 用于 ← [[Infrastructure as Code]]
|
||||
- [[AWS Service Catalog]] ← 用于 ← [[Infrastructure as Code]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks]] ← 相关 ← [[Amazon EKS]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-64-scaling-out-with-amazon-eks]] ← 相关 ← [[Cluster Autoscaler]]
|
||||
- [[public-cloud-learning-sessions-eks-optimization-part-3-of-3-introduction-to-eks]] ← 相关 ← [[Amazon EKS]]
|
||||
- [[ctp-topic-67-cloud-native-observability-using-opentelemetry]] ← 相关 ← [[AWS OpenTelemetry]]
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]] ← uses ← [[Infrastructure-as-Code-IaC]]
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]] ← deployed_by ← [[Terraform]]
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]] ← deployed_by ← [[AWS-Service-Catalog]]
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]] ← manages_traffic_with ← [[ALB-Ingress-Controller]]
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]] ← networking_extended_by ← [[EMI-Elastic-Network-Interface]]
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]] ← scales_with ← [[Cluster-Autoscaler]]
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]] ← monitors_with ← [[CloudWatch-Agent]] + [[FluentBit]] + [[Container-Insights]]
|
||||
- [[Grafana]] ← visualizes ← [[Amazon-EKS]] monitoring data
|
||||
- [[Amazon-EKS]] ← extends ← [[Kubernetes]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Contradictions
|
||||
- 与 [[ctp-topic-59-achieving-reliability-with-amazon-eks]] 可能存在内容重叠:
|
||||
- 冲突点:两篇均涉及 EKS 特性,但侧重点不同
|
||||
- 当前观点:Topic 70 侧重 IaC 部署方法和网络/监控机制
|
||||
- 对方观点:Topic 59 侧重 EKS 可靠性保证和最佳实践
|
||||
- (本主题未发现与其他 Wiki 页面的直接冲突,与相关 EKS 主题形成互补关系)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ tags:
|
||||
- Bottlerocket
|
||||
- Container OS
|
||||
- Cloud-Native
|
||||
date: 2026-04-24
|
||||
date: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Source File
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ date: 2026-04-14
|
||||
## Key Concepts
|
||||
- [[Global Information Security Policy (GISP)]]:最高纲领性政策,季度审查
|
||||
- [[ISO-27001]]:姿态框架基础,2022 年更新,新增 11 个控制方面
|
||||
- [[Security-Awareness-Training]]:月度安全通讯 + 网络钓鱼演练
|
||||
- [[Third-Party-Penetration-Testing]]:年度桌面演练 + 红队演练
|
||||
- [[Threat-Intelligence]]:结合 BrightCloud 等工具的威胁情报体系
|
||||
- [[Security Awareness Training]]:月度安全通讯 + 网络钓鱼演练
|
||||
- [[Third Party Penetration Testing]]:年度桌面演练 + 红队演练
|
||||
- [[Threat Intelligence]]:结合 BrightCloud 等工具的威胁情报体系
|
||||
- [[FedRAMP]]:政府级云安全认证
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Entities
|
||||
@@ -51,5 +51,5 @@ date: 2026-04-14
|
||||
|
||||
## Contradictions
|
||||
- 与 [[CTP-Topic-10-AWS-Landing-Zone-LZ-Data-Collection-Tagging-Related-Security]] 存在视角互补而非冲突:
|
||||
- 冲突点:两者均涉及安全治理,但 Topic 10 聚焦于 AWS 层面的标签化安全策略(SCP/Checkpoint),Topic 41 聚焦于企业级安全政策框架(ISO 27001/GISP)
|
||||
- 冲突点:两者均涉及安全治理,但 Topic 10 聚焦于 AWS 层面的标签化安全策略(SCP/Checkpoint),本主题聚焦于企业级安全政策框架(ISO 27001/GISP)
|
||||
- 当前观点:两者互补——GISP 定义全局政策纲领,AWS Landing Zone 层面通过标签和 SCP 实现技术落地
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user