Auto-sync: 2026-04-19 16:02
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "CTP Topic 21 Supply Chain Security in Micro Focus"
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Security
|
||||
- Supply-Chain
|
||||
- CTP
|
||||
- Cloud-Learning
|
||||
date: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Source File
|
||||
- [[raw/Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/07_Security/ctp-topic-21-supply-chain-security-in-micro-focus.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
- 核心主题:Micro Focus 软件供应链安全的新方法
|
||||
- 问题域:云转型背景下的供应链安全挑战
|
||||
- 方法/机制:从 99% 研发安全转向全生命周期安全防护,将供应链安全作为 SDL 第五大支柱
|
||||
- 结论/价值:必须同时确保 CI(构建环境、自动化服务器)和 CD(交付系统)的完整性
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Claims
|
||||
- Micro Focus 内部存在 17 种不同的源码管理工具(SCM),为统一安全基准带来挑战
|
||||
-SolarWinds 攻击事件是供应链安全的重要警示,黑客通过渗透构建过程注入恶意代码
|
||||
- 供应链安全应作为软件开发生命周期(SDL)的第五大支柱
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Quotes
|
||||
> "供应链不仅包含纯粹的代码开发,还涵盖了从源码管理(SCM)、构建组件(CI)、制品库到最终交付系统(CD)的所有环节"
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Concepts
|
||||
- [[Supply Chain Security]]:软件供应链安全,保护从开发到交付的全流程
|
||||
- [[SDL (Security Development Lifecycle)]]:软件安全开发生命周期
|
||||
- [[CI/CD Security]]:持续集成与持续交付的安全
|
||||
- [[SolarWinds Hack]]:著名的供应链攻击事件
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Entities
|
||||
- [[Micro Focus]]:企业软件公司,正在进行云转型
|
||||
- [[Shlomi Ben-Hur]]:Micro Focus 产品安全小组,主讲人
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[CTP Overview]] ← context_of ← [[Supply Chain Security]]
|
||||
- [[Security Development Lifecycle]] ← includes ← [[Supply Chain Security]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Contradictions
|
||||
- 无
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
- 视频来源:NAS `/volume2/work/Public Cloud Learning Sessions/CTP _ Topic 21_ Supply Chain Security in Micro Focus.mp4`
|
||||
- 状态:已完成 Gemini 摘要
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "CTP Topic 49 Container Lifecycle Hardening Standards"
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
tags: [Container, Security, Hardening, CTP, Micro Focus]
|
||||
date: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Source File
|
||||
- [[raw/Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/07_Security/ctp-topic-49-container-lifecycle-hardening-standards.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
- 核心主题:Micro Focus 容器生命周期加固标准,聚焦构建阶段的安全最佳实践
|
||||
- 问题域:容器镜像安全、运行时安全配置、供应链安全
|
||||
- 方法/机制:11 项容器镜像构建标准,涵盖基础镜像选择、敏感信息管理、文件系统加固、镜像扫描等
|
||||
- 结论/价值:为容器化应用提供系统化的安全加固指导,降低容器被攻破的风险
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Claims
|
||||
- 使用 Micro Focus 基础镜像可避免开源默认镜像的已知漏洞
|
||||
- 采用 init 系统(如 teeny)可处理信号并防止僵尸进程耗尽资源
|
||||
- 敏感信息不应嵌入容器镜像,应使用 Kubernetes Secrets 在运行时获取
|
||||
- 只读文件系统(readOnlyRootFilesystem=true)可防止未授权文件创建
|
||||
- 每个容器应只运行一个应用程序,防止进程间相互干扰
|
||||
- 禁用容器内 Kubernetes API 访问(automountServiceAccountToken=false)可限制潜在 compromise 的影响范围
|
||||
- 应使用私有服务账户而非默认服务账户,控制权限并最小化权限提升
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Quotes
|
||||
> "Use micro focus base image which are configured to be secure with non and trust weighted components." — Ashish, Product Security Group
|
||||
> "If one application is compromised process in one application can interfere with the process of other application in the same container." — 标准说明
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Concepts
|
||||
- [[Container-Lifecycle-Hardening]]:容器全生命周期(构建、部署、运行)的安全加固实践
|
||||
- [[Container-Image-Scanning]]:使用扫描工具识别容器镜像中的漏洞
|
||||
- [[Read-Only-Root-Filesystem]]:将容器根文件系统设为只读的安全配置
|
||||
- [[Init-System]]:容器内的初始化进程,用于处理信号和回收僵尸进程
|
||||
- [[Kubernetes-Service-Account]]:Kubernetes 中用于 Pod 身份认证的机制
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Entities
|
||||
- [[Micro Focus]]:企业软件公司,产品安全组制定本标准
|
||||
- [[Kubernetes]]:容器编排平台,本标准主要针对 K8s 环境
|
||||
- [[Ashish]]:Product Security Group 安全专家,本课程讲师
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[Container-Lifecycle-Hardening]] ← applies_to ← [[Micro Focus]]
|
||||
- [[Container-Image-Scanning]] ← depends_on ← [[Kubernetes]]
|
||||
- [[CTP Topic 21 Supply Chain Security in Micro Focus]] ← relates_to ← 本标准(供应链安全)
|
||||
|
||||
## Contradictions
|
||||
- 本标准专注于构建阶段,部署和运行阶段的标准将在后续会议中覆盖
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "CTP Topic 52 3 Lines of Defence (3LoD) framework Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)"
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
tags: [Security, CSPM, 3LoD, CTP, Cloud-Security]
|
||||
date: 2026-04-14
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Source File
|
||||
- [[raw/Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/07_Security/ctp-topic-52-3-lines-of-defence-3lod-framework-cloud-security-posture-management.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
- 核心主题:三道防线(3LoD)框架与云安全态势管理(CSPM)
|
||||
- 问题域:企业云安全组织架构与统一安全态势管理
|
||||
- 方法/机制:3LoD 框架明确角色职责,CSPM 统一监控多云账户安全配置
|
||||
- 结论/价值:通过 Cloud Guard 实现跨云账户的安全配置集中监控与合规评估
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Claims
|
||||
- 三道防线模型经 ELT 审批通过,成为组织标准安全框架
|
||||
- CSPM 解决多云环境安全割裂问题,提供单一视图
|
||||
- Cloud Guard 在账户创建时自动接入,确保全面覆盖
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Quotes
|
||||
> "The three lines of defense model was approved by ELT mid-year and serves as the organization's go-to model." — Coyote, Head of Enterprise Application Security
|
||||
|
||||
> "CSPM should consolidate misconfigurations from multiple cloud accounts into a single platform, provide compliance framework views (CIS, NIST, ISO), and allow custom policies." — 核心需求
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Concepts
|
||||
- [[Three-Lines-of-Defense]]:三道防线框架,第一道为业务单元,第二道为集团办公室,第三道为审计
|
||||
- [[Cloud-Security-Posture-Management]]:云安全态势管理,持续监控云资源配置合规性
|
||||
- [[Cloud-Guard]]:选中 CSPM 解决方案,提供态势管理、资产管理、网络配置探索、事件管理、身份管理
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Entities
|
||||
- [[Coyote]]:Head of Enterprise Application Security,三道防线框架与 CSPM 方案主讲人
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
- [[Three-Lines-of-Defense]] ← depends_on ← [[Regulatory-Compliance]]
|
||||
- [[Cloud-Security-Posture-Management]] ← implements ← [[Cloud-Guard]]
|
||||
- [[Cloud-Guard]] ← monitors ← [[Multi-Account-Cloud-Environment]]
|
||||
- [[CTP-Topic-52]] ← part_of ← [[Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Contradictions
|
||||
- 无冲突记录
|
||||
69
wiki/sources/ctp-topic-55-aws-firewall-manager.md
Normal file
69
wiki/sources/ctp-topic-55-aws-firewall-manager.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: ctp-topic-55-aws-firewall-manager
|
||||
title: "CTP Topic 55 AWS Firewall Manager"
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- AWS
|
||||
- Firewall-Manager
|
||||
- Security
|
||||
- CTP
|
||||
- Multi-Account
|
||||
- Security-Group
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- raw/Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/07_Security/ctp-topic-55-aws-firewall-manager.md
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Source File
|
||||
|
||||
- [[raw/Cloud & DevOps/Public-Cloud-Learning-Sessions/07_Security/ctp-topic-55-aws-firewall-manager.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- **核心主题**:AWS Firewall Manager 多账号安全策略集中管理
|
||||
- **问题域**:多 Landing Zone 环境下的跨账号防火墙策略统一配置与自动修复
|
||||
- **方法/机制**:Firewall Manager + AWS Config + Lambda 事件驱动策略执行
|
||||
- **结论/价值**:实现安全策略的中央化管理,减少安全策略推广时间,统一基线安全组
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Claims
|
||||
|
||||
- Firewall Manager 可跨多个 Landing Zone(RLabs、RD、SAS、CAT)集中管理安全策略
|
||||
- Firewall Manager 支持三种安全组策略类型:通用安全组、审计与强制、清理未使用安全组
|
||||
- 通过 Prefix List + RAM 实现跨账号安全组规则共享和更新
|
||||
- 使用 AWS Config + Lambda 触发事件并执行策略自动修复
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Quotes
|
||||
|
||||
> "The primary reasons for adopting Firewall Manager in Grand Torque Landing Zone are to address the challenges of managing security policies across multiple landing zones with varying security requirements."
|
||||
|
||||
> "SAS Landing Zone serves external customers via public subnets, necessitated additional security rules to protect against traffic not scanned by Checkpoint."
|
||||
|
||||
> "Prefix list facilitates sharing security group rules across accounts using RAM."
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Concepts
|
||||
|
||||
- [[AWS Firewall Manager]]:跨账号集中配置防火墙规则和安全策略的管理服务
|
||||
- [[AWS Config]]:AWS 配置审计与合规性服务,用于触发策略事件
|
||||
- [[Prefix List]]:预定义 CIDR 块集合,用于跨账号共享规则
|
||||
- [[RAM(Resource Access Manager)]]:AWS 资源访问管理工具,支持跨账号资源分享
|
||||
- [[Security Group]]:AWS VPC 安全组,控制入站和出站流量
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Entities
|
||||
|
||||
- [[Grand Torque Landing Zone]]:组织采用的多账号 Landing Zone 架构(RLabs、RD、SAS、CAT)
|
||||
- [[LAPS Landing Zone]]:早期使用 Checkpoint Firewall 的 Landing Zone
|
||||
- [[SAS Landing Zone]]:面向外部客户提供服务的 Landing Zone,需要额外安全规则
|
||||
- [[Digital Factory Landing Zone]]:部署 Atlantis 服务器用于发布 Firewall Manager 变更
|
||||
- [[QALIS]]:共享服务,扫描产品账户中的实例
|
||||
|
||||
## Connections
|
||||
|
||||
- [[AWS Firewall Manager]] ← managed_by ← [[AWS Config]]
|
||||
- [[AWS Firewall Manager]] ← uses ← [[RAM]]
|
||||
- [[Security Group]] ← shared_via ← [[Prefix List]]
|
||||
- [[SAS Landing Zone]] ← protected_by ← [[AWS Firewall Manager]]
|
||||
- [[LAPS Landing Zone]] ← previously_used ← [[Checkpoint Firewall]]
|
||||
|
||||
## Contradictions
|
||||
|
||||
- 与 [[Checkpoint Firewall]] 在 LAPS Landing Zone 中的广泛开放规则冲突:Firewall Manager 提供更细粒度的安全组控制
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user