Update nexus: fix conflicts and sync local changes
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,51 +1,51 @@
|
||||
# ITOM-Cloud-Service-Backup-Integrity-Testing-Plan_686074315
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes the general backup integrity testing plan to cover ITOM Cloud Deployed Products - ESM, OpsB, NOM, APM.
|
||||
|
||||
## Description
|
||||
|
||||
- We perform product backup integrity testing testing every 6 months to be compliant with ISO (May/June – localbackup; November/December – remote backup (DR account)
|
||||
- This activity is business critical and mandatory and required by many regulations and audits.
|
||||
- Some of our obligations for having the process in place and validated are:
|
||||
- Ready to use and validated disaster recovery plan in place, which will help us to avoid catastrophic customer data loss (reduce damage or disruption and recover as possible in the
|
||||
event of a disaster that leads to system failure or in case of customer account theft)
|
||||
- Business continuity. All relevant teams, including CSD, RnD, other stakeholders will be notified one month before executing this drill
|
||||
- The backup integrity testing report will be published regluarly basis to Cloud customers to prove DR resolution availbility
|
||||
|
||||
## Owner
|
||||
|
||||
- Assign an Owner in each Cloud Ops team to be responsible for
|
||||
- Developing plans
|
||||
- Updating DR resolution documents
|
||||
- Overseeing the execution of backup integrity operations
|
||||
- Publishing backup integrity testing result reports.
|
||||
|
||||
## Plan
|
||||
|
||||
- Notification to all internal stakeholders about backup integrity testing 1 month before the execution
|
||||
- Backup integrity testing testing every 6 months to be compliant with ISO
|
||||
- 1st backup integrity testing - **May/June** – localbackup
|
||||
- 2nd backup integrity testing - **November/December** – remote backup
|
||||
|
||||
## General Procedures
|
||||
|
||||
- Data backup validation
|
||||
- Select 1 non-prod farm/instance in a different region (AWS North Virginia, AWS Ireland,
|
||||
AWS Sydney, AWS London, AWS Canada)
|
||||
- There are some places where the customer data may be located:
|
||||
- AWS RDS
|
||||
- AWS EFS
|
||||
- AWS EBS
|
||||
- EKS K8S Configuration (Velero)
|
||||
- EC2 Instances
|
||||
- Need to be checked if there is back up data for all relevant components, if not please ensure
|
||||
the backup mechanism is in place
|
||||
- Perform Data Restore
|
||||
- Select a specific set of backup data (with the same timestamp) for data recovery
|
||||
- Record the approximate steps of the entire data recovery and how long it took
|
||||
- Validate restored farm/instance
|
||||
- We're leverage APM service availbility check and AWS Sythetics Check to validate success of data restore
|
||||
- Confirm all major functionalities are working as expected
|
||||
- Prepare backup integrity testing report
|
||||
- Please refer to the attached document format to prepare the DR validation testing report. [ESM DR Validation Report - May 2023.docx](#)
|
||||
# ITOM-Cloud-Service-Backup-Integrity-Testing-Plan_686074315
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes the general backup integrity testing plan to cover ITOM Cloud Deployed Products - ESM, OpsB, NOM, APM.
|
||||
|
||||
## Description
|
||||
|
||||
- We perform product backup integrity testing testing every 6 months to be compliant with ISO (May/June – localbackup; November/December – remote backup (DR account)
|
||||
- This activity is business critical and mandatory and required by many regulations and audits.
|
||||
- Some of our obligations for having the process in place and validated are:
|
||||
- Ready to use and validated disaster recovery plan in place, which will help us to avoid catastrophic customer data loss (reduce damage or disruption and recover as possible in the
|
||||
event of a disaster that leads to system failure or in case of customer account theft)
|
||||
- Business continuity. All relevant teams, including CSD, RnD, other stakeholders will be notified one month before executing this drill
|
||||
- The backup integrity testing report will be published regluarly basis to Cloud customers to prove DR resolution availbility
|
||||
|
||||
## Owner
|
||||
|
||||
- Assign an Owner in each Cloud Ops team to be responsible for
|
||||
- Developing plans
|
||||
- Updating DR resolution documents
|
||||
- Overseeing the execution of backup integrity operations
|
||||
- Publishing backup integrity testing result reports.
|
||||
|
||||
## Plan
|
||||
|
||||
- Notification to all internal stakeholders about backup integrity testing 1 month before the execution
|
||||
- Backup integrity testing testing every 6 months to be compliant with ISO
|
||||
- 1st backup integrity testing - **May/June** – localbackup
|
||||
- 2nd backup integrity testing - **November/December** – remote backup
|
||||
|
||||
## General Procedures
|
||||
|
||||
- Data backup validation
|
||||
- Select 1 non-prod farm/instance in a different region (AWS North Virginia, AWS Ireland,
|
||||
AWS Sydney, AWS London, AWS Canada)
|
||||
- There are some places where the customer data may be located:
|
||||
- AWS RDS
|
||||
- AWS EFS
|
||||
- AWS EBS
|
||||
- EKS K8S Configuration (Velero)
|
||||
- EC2 Instances
|
||||
- Need to be checked if there is back up data for all relevant components, if not please ensure
|
||||
the backup mechanism is in place
|
||||
- Perform Data Restore
|
||||
- Select a specific set of backup data (with the same timestamp) for data recovery
|
||||
- Record the approximate steps of the entire data recovery and how long it took
|
||||
- Validate restored farm/instance
|
||||
- We're leverage APM service availbility check and AWS Sythetics Check to validate success of data restore
|
||||
- Confirm all major functionalities are working as expected
|
||||
- Prepare backup integrity testing report
|
||||
- Please refer to the attached document format to prepare the DR validation testing report. [ESM DR Validation Report - May 2023.docx](#)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user