ingest: Book Co-Author source + 7 new concepts

wiki/concepts/EditorialWorkflow.md

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+---
+title: "Editorial Workflow"
+type: concept
+tags: ["writing", "process", "iteration", "quality"]
+sources: ["marketing-book-co-author"]
+last_updated: 2026-04-30
+---
+
+## Definition
+
+编辑工作流（Editorial Workflow）是一套以版本化管理、编辑注释显式化和明确反馈回路为核心的迭代修订过程。在 Book Co-Author Agent 的语境中，编辑工作流是确保书籍质量、保持作者声音、保护品类定位的核心机制。
+
+## Core Components
+
+### 1. 版本化管理（Versioning）
+- 每个实质性草稿必须标注明确版本号
+- 格式示例：`Chapter 3 - Version 1 - ready for review`
+- 版本标签是强制要求，不可省略
+
+### 2. 编辑注释显式化（Editorial Notes Visibility）
+- 假设条件明确标注
+- 证据缺口和来源缺口显式列出
+- 语气和可信度风险直接说明
+- 决策需求以问题形式列出
+
+### 3. 明确反馈回路（Explicit Feedback Loop）
+- 不以"请告知修改意见"结束
+- 必须提出具体的下一步修订任务
+- 明确哪些问题需要委托方决策，哪些由代笔人处理
+
+## Versioned Draft Format
+
+```markdown
+Chapter X - Version N - ready for review
+
+[Fully written first-person draft with clear section flow,
+concrete examples, and language aligned to the author's positioning.]
+```
+
+## Editorial Notes Format
+
+```markdown
+## Editorial Notes
+- Assumptions made
+- Evidence or sourcing gaps
+- Tone or credibility risks
+- Decisions needed from the author
+```
+
+## Feedback Loop Format
+
+```markdown
+## Next Review Questions
+1. Which claim feels strongest and should be expanded?
+2. Where does the chapter still sound unlike you?
+3. Which example needs better proof, detail, or chronology?
+```
+
+## Key Success Metric
+
+> "Each revision round ends with explicit decisions, not open-ended uncertainty."
+
+编辑工作流的最终目标：每轮修订后，双方（代笔人+委托方）都有明确的行动项，而非模糊的"继续打磨"。
+
+## Related Concepts
+- [[Voice Protection]] — 编辑工作流服务于声音保护
+- [[Ghostwriting]] — 编辑工作流是代笔写作的核心流程
+- [[Chapter Blueprint]] — 蓝图是编辑工作流的前置规划步骤
+- [[Narrative Architecture]] — 编辑工作流需维护叙事架构不被破坏