add sreweekly data dir + openclaw 每日复盘 2026-09-04
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# Without a program to support them, incident management processes wither
|
||||
|
||||
- **期号**: SRE Weekly Issue #529(2026-08-10)
|
||||
- **作者**: Brent Chapman
|
||||
- **链接**: https://greatcircle.com/blog/2026/07/14/incident-management-process-versus-program/
|
||||
|
||||
## 简介
|
||||
|
||||
It’s not enough to define an incident process. You have to spin up and maintain an entire incident management program.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# What Comes After Observability?
|
||||
|
||||
- **期号**: SRE Weekly Issue #529(2026-08-10)
|
||||
- **作者**: Austin Parker — Honeycomb
|
||||
- **链接**: https://www.honeycomb.io/blog/what-comes-after-observability
|
||||
|
||||
## 简介
|
||||
|
||||
Honeycomb pulls back the curtain a bit to delve into how LLM agents change the way their product is used, and how their query patterns differ from humans’. It’s especially interesting that increasing agent usage has not correlated with decreasing human usage.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
# The Rise of Agentic SRE: Humans, Agents, and Reliability
|
||||
|
||||
- **期号**: SRE Weekly Issue #529(2026-08-10)
|
||||
- **作者**: Neel Shah — DZone
|
||||
- **链接**: https://dzone.com/articles/rise-of-agentic-sre
|
||||
|
||||
## 简介
|
||||
|
||||
I like the approach here, especially measuring both the positive and negative outcomes.
|
||||
|
||||
> Good SRE practice is about evidence, not enthusiasm.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# Incident Report: July 2, 2026 — US East Services Outage
|
||||
|
||||
- **期号**: SRE Weekly Issue #529(2026-08-10)
|
||||
- **作者**: Ray Chen — Railway
|
||||
- **链接**: https://blog.railway.com/p/incident-report-july-2-2026-us-east-services-outage
|
||||
|
||||
## 简介
|
||||
|
||||
The kernel’s route cache: a hidden reliability killer. This is a really intriguing case of self-sustaining impact.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# Finding bugs in Raft implementations
|
||||
|
||||
- **期号**: SRE Weekly Issue #529(2026-08-10)
|
||||
- **作者**: TW Lim — Antithesis
|
||||
- **链接**: https://antithesis.com/blog/2026/finding-bugs-in-raft-implementations/
|
||||
|
||||
## 简介
|
||||
|
||||
> …we rely on formal verification, and this is how consensus algorithms are built today. We define a model that we can mathematically prove to be correct, and then we… translate this perfect, platonic thing into code.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# How to Build Your Infrastructure Monitoring in 2026 ·
|
||||
|
||||
- **期号**: SRE Weekly Issue #529(2026-08-10)
|
||||
- **作者**: Omar Ghader
|
||||
- **链接**: https://omarghader.github.io/monitoring-infrastructure-guide-2026/
|
||||
|
||||
## 简介
|
||||
|
||||
I love that this starts with the user. Monitor what matters to your users, and alert on what you can action.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# Getting access to the /tmp of a systemd service with PrivateTmp=yes
|
||||
|
||||
- **期号**: SRE Weekly Issue #529(2026-08-10)
|
||||
- **作者**: Chris Siebenmann
|
||||
- **链接**: https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/linux/SystemdPrivateTmpWhere
|
||||
|
||||
## 简介
|
||||
|
||||
First time I’ve heard of systemd’s PrivateTmp feature. Neat!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
# Traditional versus resilience engineering views
|
||||
|
||||
- **期号**: SRE Weekly Issue #529(2026-08-10)
|
||||
- **作者**: Lorin Hochstein
|
||||
- **链接**: https://surfingcomplexity.blog/2026/08/02/traditional-versus-resilience-engineering-views/
|
||||
|
||||
## 简介
|
||||
|
||||
> I thought it would be a useful exercise to brainstorm some of the differences in focus between what I’ll call the traditional view of reliability, and the resilience engineering view.
|
||||
|
||||
It’s short (just a table), but it definitely made me think.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user