38 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
# Traditional versus resilience engineering views
|
||
|
||
- **期号**: SRE Weekly Issue #529（2026-08-10）
|
||
- **作者**: Lorin Hochstein
|
||
- **链接**: https://surfingcomplexity.blog/2026/08/02/traditional-versus-resilience-engineering-views/
|
||
|
||
## 简介
|
||
|
||
> I thought it would be a useful exercise to brainstorm some of the differences in focus between what I’ll call the traditional view of reliability, and the resilience engineering view.
|
||
|
||
It’s short (just a table), but it definitely made me think.
|
||
|
||
## 正文
|
||
|
||
As a fan of resilience engineering, I often differ with people on where we should focus our scarce engineering cycles in order to improve reliability.
|
||
|
||
I thought it would be a useful exercise to brainstorm some of the differences in focus between what I’ll call the *traditional* view of reliability, and the resilience engineering view.
|
||
|
||
| **Traditional view focuses on** | **Resilience engineering view focuses on** |
|
||
| accountability | coordination |
|
||
| prioritization | goal conflicts |
|
||
| risk mitigation | risk trade-offs |
|
||
| better processes and conformance thereof | more expertise |
|
||
| quantitative | qualitative |
|
||
| root cause | interaction of multiple factors |
|
||
| action items | insight |
|
||
| preventing future incidents, ensuring all incidents are novel | better handling of novel incidents |
|
||
| reducing complexity | navigating complexity |
|
||
| objectives | production pressure |
|
||
| robustness | resilience |
|
||
| human variability as liability | human variability as asset |
|
||
| building accurate system model | repairing inevitable model errors |
|
||
| rigor | improvisation |
|
||
| explicit knowledge | tacit knowledge |
|
||
| automation, benefits of | automation, risks introduced by |
|
||
|
||
## One thought on “Traditional versus resilience engineering views”
|